Literature DB >> 10598963

Bipolar ventricular far-field signals in the atrium.

G Fröhlig1, Z Helwani, O Kusch, M Berg, H Schieffer.   

Abstract

In an attempt to evaluate the prevalence and predisposing factors of bipolar ventricular far-field oversensing, 57 patients were studied who had a Medtronic dual chamber pacemaker implanted (models 7940: n = 6; 7960i: n = 41; 401: n = 3; 8968i: n = 7) and bipolar atrial leads with a dipole spacing from 8.6 to 60 mm attached to various parts of the atrial wall (lateral/anterior: n = 30; appendage: n = 10; atrial septum: n = 10; floating: n = 7). Median bipolar sensing threshold for P waves was 4.0 mV (2.8-4.0 mV, lower and upper quartile) with standard leads and 0.35 (0.25-1.4) mV with single pass (VDD) devices. At the highest sensitivity available, 43 of 50 DDD pacemakers but only two of seven VDD systems detected intrinsic R waves in the atrium (P < 0.01). Ventricular far-field oversensing occurred at 0.5 mV in 28 (56%) and at 1.0 mV in 16 of 50 DDD units (32%), respectively, and there was one observation in a septal implant at a sensitivity of even 2.8 mV. With ventricular pacing, VDD systems were as susceptible to far-field signals as DDD pacemakers. Outside the postventricular blanking period (100 ms), evoked R waves were detected by 27 of 57 systems (47%) at maximum atrial sensitivity, by 10 (18%) at 0.5 mV, and by 2 (4%) at a setting of 1.0 up to 1.4 mV, respectively. There was no definite superiority of any lead position, there was a trend in favor of the atrial free wall for better intrinsic R wave rejection, but just the opposite was the case for paced ventricular beats. Bipolar signal discrimination tended to be higher with short tip-to-ring spacing (1 7.8 mm) but the difference to larger dipole lengths (30-60 mm) was not significant in terms of the R to P wave ratio and the overall far-field susceptibility. In summary, bipolar ventricular far-field oversensing in the atrium is common with short postventricular blanking times and high atrial sensitivity settings that may be warranted for tachyarrhythmia detection and mode switching. A potentially more discriminant effect of shorter dipole lengths (< or = 10 mm) remains to be tested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10598963     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1999.tb00379.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  7 in total

Review 1.  A reappraisal of pacemaker timing cycles pertaining to automatic mode switching.

Authors:  R X Stroobandt; S S Barold; F D Vandenbulcke; R J Willems; A F Sinnaeve
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Atrial near-field and ventricular far-field analysis by automated signal processing at rest and during exercise.

Authors:  Frank Eberhardt; Hendrik Bonnemeier; Martin Lipphardt; Ulrich G Hofmann; Heribert Schunkert; Uwe K H Wiegand
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  Preventricular far-field sensing in the atrial channel of dual chamber pacemakers--an occasional cause of inappropriate mode switch.

Authors:  Christof Kolb; Selim Aratma; Bernhard Zrenner; Claus Schmitt
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Use of an atrial lead with very short tip-to-ring spacing avoids oversensing of far-field R-wave.

Authors:  Christof Kolb; Georg Nölker; Carsten Lennerz; Hansmartin Jetter; Verena Semmler; Klaus Pürner; Klaus-Jürgen Gutleben; Tilko Reents; Klaus Lang; Ulrich Lotze
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Selecting dual chamber or single chamber implantable defibrillators: what is the golden rule?

Authors:  Massimo Santini; Renato Ricci
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2003-10-01

Review 6.  The role of pacing in rhythm control and management of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  John Silberbauer; Neil Sulke
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2007-05-02       Impact factor: 1.759

7.  Ambulatory Holter monitoring in asymptomatic patients with DDD pacemakers - do we need ACC/AHA Guidelines revision?

Authors:  Michal Chudzik; Artur Klimczak; Jerzy Krzysztof Wranicz
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 3.318

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.