BACKGROUND: It is not known whether the effects of desflurane on local cerebral glucose utilization (LCGU) and local cerebral blood flow (LCBF) are different from those of other volatile anesthetics. METHODS: Using the autoradiographic iodoantipyrine and deoxyglucose methods, LCGU, LCBF, and their overall means were measured in 60 Sprague-Dawley rats (10 groups, n = 6 each) during desflurane and isoflurane anesthesia and in conscious controls. RESULTS: During anesthesia, mean cerebral glucose utilization was decreased compared with conscious controls: 1 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) desflurane: -52%; 1 MAC isoflurane: -44%; 2 MAC desflurane: -62%; and 2 MAC isoflurane: -60%. Local analysis showed a reduction of LCGU in the majority of the 40 brain regions analyzed. Mean cerebral blood flow was increased: 1 MAC desflurane: +40%; 1 MAC isoflurane: +43%; 2 MAC desflurane and 2 MAC isoflurane: +70%. LCBF was increased in all brain structures investigated except in the auditory cortex. No significant differences (P < 0.05) could be observed between both anesthetics for mean values of cerebral glucose use and blood flow. Correlation coefficients obtained for the relation between LCGU and LCBF were as follows: controls: 0.95; 1 MAC desflurane: 0.89; 2 MAC desflurane: 0.60; 1 MAC isoflurane: 0.87; and 2 MAC isoflurane: 0.68. CONCLUSION: Differences in the physicochemical properties of desflurane compared with isoflurane are not associated with major differences in the effects of both volatile anesthetics on cerebral glucose utilization, blood flow, and the coupling between LCBF and LCGU.
BACKGROUND: It is not known whether the effects of desflurane on local cerebral glucose utilization (LCGU) and local cerebral blood flow (LCBF) are different from those of other volatile anesthetics. METHODS: Using the autoradiographic iodoantipyrine and deoxyglucose methods, LCGU, LCBF, and their overall means were measured in 60 Sprague-Dawley rats (10 groups, n = 6 each) during desflurane and isoflurane anesthesia and in conscious controls. RESULTS: During anesthesia, mean cerebral glucose utilization was decreased compared with conscious controls: 1 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) desflurane: -52%; 1 MAC isoflurane: -44%; 2 MAC desflurane: -62%; and 2 MAC isoflurane: -60%. Local analysis showed a reduction of LCGU in the majority of the 40 brain regions analyzed. Mean cerebral blood flow was increased: 1 MAC desflurane: +40%; 1 MAC isoflurane: +43%; 2 MAC desflurane and 2 MAC isoflurane: +70%. LCBF was increased in all brain structures investigated except in the auditory cortex. No significant differences (P < 0.05) could be observed between both anesthetics for mean values of cerebral glucose use and blood flow. Correlation coefficients obtained for the relation between LCGU and LCBF were as follows: controls: 0.95; 1 MAC desflurane: 0.89; 2 MAC desflurane: 0.60; 1 MAC isoflurane: 0.87; and 2 MAC isoflurane: 0.68. CONCLUSION: Differences in the physicochemical properties of desflurane compared with isoflurane are not associated with major differences in the effects of both volatile anesthetics on cerebral glucose utilization, blood flow, and the coupling between LCBF and LCGU.
Authors: Alessandro Putzu; Silvia Valtorta; Giuseppe Di Grigoli; Matthias Haenggi; Sara Belloli; Antonio Malgaroli; Marco Gemma; Giovanni Landoni; Luigi Beretta; Rosa Maria Moresco Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Shrinivas Bishu; Kathleen C Schmidt; Thomas V Burlin; Michael A Channing; Lisa Horowitz; Tianjiang Huang; Zhong-hua Liu; Mei Qin; B-K Vuong; Aaron J Unterman; Zengyan Xia; Alan Zametkin; Peter Herscovitch; Zenaide Quezado; Carolyn B Smith Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2009-02-18 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Congwu Du; Melissa Tully; Nora D Volkow; Wynne K Schiffer; Mei Yu; Zhongchi Luo; Alan P Koretsky; Helene Benveniste Journal: Eur J Neurosci Date: 2009-10-12 Impact factor: 3.386
Authors: Shengwen Deng; Crystal G Franklin; Michael O'Boyle; Wei Zhang; Betty L Heyl; Paul A Jerabek; Hanzhang Lu; Peter T Fox Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2022-01-20 Impact factor: 7.400