Literature DB >> 10598608

Pharyngeal mucosal pressure and perfusion: a fiberoptic evaluation of the posterior pharynx in anesthetized adult patients with a modified cuffed oropharyngeal airway.

J Brimacombe1, C Keller, F Pühringer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pharyngeal airway devices can exert substantial pressures against the pharyngeal mucosa. The authors assess the relation between pharyngeal mucosal perfusion and directly measured mucosal pressure (MP) in the posterior pharynx using a fiberoptic technique with a modified cuffed oropharyngeal airway (COPA). The authors also measure in vivo intracuff pressure (CP), airway sealing pressure and MP at four locations using an unmodified COPA.
METHODS: Twenty adult patients, American Society of Anesthesiologists status I or II, undergoing general anesthesia were allocated randomly to receive either (1) a COPA with a millimeter microchip sensor fixed on the external cuff surface to record distal posterior pharyngeal MP or (2) a COPA with a fiberoptic scope inserted inside the cuff to record digitized images of the distal posterior pharyngeal mucosa. MP and digitized images were obtained at the same location over an in vivo CP range of 10-160 cm H2O in 10- to 20-cm H2O increments. The digitized images were scored according to blood vessel caliber and mucosal color by two investigators blinded to MP and CP. In an additional 20 matched patients, in vivo CP, airway sealing pressure, and MP was measured at four different cuff locations (corresponding to the anterior, lateral, and posterior pharynx and the distal oropharynx) with increasing cuff volume.
RESULTS: Blood vessel caliber and mucosal color was normal in all patients when the mean mucosal pressure was 17 cm H2O. Blood vessel caliber was first reduced when the mean mucosal pressure was 34 cm H2O. There was a progressive incremental reduction in blood vessel caliber and mucosal color when the mean mucosal pressure increased from 34 to 80 cm H2O (P < or = 0.05). Complete blood vessel collapse and mucosal paling first occurred with the mean mucosal pressure was 73 cm H2O and was present in 90% of patients when the mean mucosal pressure was 80 cm H2O. Mean MP was always higher in the posterior pharynx compared with the other locations when the cuff volume was 20 ml or greater (P < 0.001). In vivo CP is an excellent predictor of mucosal pressure. Mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) MP in the posterior pharynx was 35 (5-67) and 78 (50-109) cm H2O when the airway sealing pressure was 10 (6-16) and 17 (13-21) cm H2O respectively.
CONCLUSION: Pharyngeal mucosal perfusion is reduced progressively in the posterior pharynx when MP is increased from 34 to 80 cm H2O with the COPA. CP provides reliable information about MP and should be less than 120 cm H2O to prevent mucosal ischemia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10598608     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199912000-00018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  16 in total

1.  [Preclinical duty of care during cuff pressure management].

Authors:  R Schalk
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 0.840

2.  Intraoperative measurement of pharynx/esophagus retraction during anterior cervical surgery. Part I: pressure.

Authors:  Oliver Heese; Frank Schröder; Manfred Westphal; Luca Papavero
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-02-14       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Clinical application of limiting laryngeal mask airway cuff pressures utilizing inflating syringe intrinsic recoil.

Authors:  David M Corda; Christopher B Robards; Mark J Rice; Timothy E Morey; Nikolaus Gravenstein; Terrie Vasilopoulos; Sorin J Brull
Journal:  Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  2018-04

4.  Randomized comparison of the i-gel™, the LMA Supreme™, and the Laryngeal Tube Suction-D using clinical and fibreoptic assessments in elective patients.

Authors:  Sebastian G Russo; Stephan Cremer; Tamara Galli; Christoph Eich; Anselm Bräuer; Thomas A Crozier; Martin Bauer; Micha Strack
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 2.217

5.  The new perilaryngeal airway (CobraPLA) is as efficient as the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) but provides better airway sealing pressures.

Authors:  Ozan Akça; Anupama Wadhwa; Papiya Sengupta; Jaleel Durrani; Keith Hanni; Mary Wenke; Yüksel Yücel; Rainer Lenhardt; Anthony G Doufas; Daniel I Sessler
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  Randomised Comparison of the AMBU AuraOnce Laryngeal Mask and the LMA Unique Laryngeal Mask Airway in Spontaneously Breathing Adults.

Authors:  Daryl Lindsay Williams; James M Zeng; Karl D Alexander; David T Andrews
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2012-02-29

7.  The effect of cuff pressure on postoperative sore throat after Cobra perilaryngeal airway.

Authors:  Han Bum Joe; Dae Hee Kim; Yun Jeong Chae; Jong Yeop Kim; Min Kang; Kwan Sik Park
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 2.078

8.  The CobraPLA during anesthesia with controlled ventilation: a clinical trial of efficacy.

Authors:  Sang Beom Nam; Yon Hee Shim; Min Soo Kim; Young Chul You; Youn-Woo Lee; Dong Woo Han; Jong Seok Lee
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2006-12-31       Impact factor: 2.759

9.  Comparison of Ambu AuraGain at low cuff pressure, Ambu AuraGain at high cuff pressure and i-gel in relation to incidence of postoperative upper airway complications.

Authors:  G P Deepak; Rakesh Kumar; Munisha Agarwal; Manoj Bharadwaj; Neera G Kumar; Riniki Sarma
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2021-06-22

10.  ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway cuff pressure changes with and without use of nitrous oxide during laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Bimla Sharma; Rajat Gupta; Raminder Sehgal; Archna Koul; Jayashree Sood
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.