Literature DB >> 10594659

Short-lasting conditioned stimulus applied to the middle cerebellar peduncle elicits delayed conditioned eye blink responses in the decerebrate ferret.

P Svensson1, M Ivarsson.   

Abstract

In delay eye blink conditioning, the conditioned stimulus (CS) ends at the time of the unconditioned stimulus (US). If the CS duration is decreased, there will be a 'trace' period with no ongoing CS before the onset of the US. During this period some neural activity has to continue after the CS offset to: (i) permit association between the CS and the US; and (ii) elicit a conditioned response appearing after the CS offset. In this study we test the role of the cerebellum in maintaining CS activity required for eliciting a conditioned response after the CS offset. Decerebrate ferrets were trained in a delay conditioning paradigm with an electrical stimulation of the forelimb as CS and of the periorbital area as US. The conditioned responses in the upper eyelid were monitored with electromyographical techniques. In well-trained animals, test CSs of short duration down to 0.2 ms were applied to the forelimb or the middle cerebellar peduncle, while the interstimulus interval between CS onset and US onset was kept constant at 300 ms. Test CSs of short duration applied to the forelimb elicited conditioned responses. More importantly, also a short-lasting CS to the middle cerebellar peduncle could elicit conditioned responses. The results indicate that precerebellar CS pathways are not required for maintaining the neural activity that elicits conditioned responses after the CS offset. It is suggested that neurons maintaining such activity are located in the cerebellum, either the cortex alone or the cortex and the deep nuclei.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10594659     DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.1999.00862.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  9 in total

Review 1.  Computational models of timing mechanisms in the cerebellar granular layer.

Authors:  Tadashi Yamazaki; Shigeru Tanaka
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Time course of classically conditioned Purkinje cell response is determined by initial part of conditioned stimulus.

Authors:  Dan-Anders Jirenhed; Germund Hesslow
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Learned response sequences in cerebellar Purkinje cells.

Authors:  Dan-Anders Jirenhed; Anders Rasmussen; Fredrik Johansson; Germund Hesslow
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Memory trace and timing mechanism localized to cerebellar Purkinje cells.

Authors:  Fredrik Johansson; Dan-Anders Jirenhed; Anders Rasmussen; Riccardo Zucca; Germund Hesslow
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Mechanisms for motor timing in the cerebellar cortex.

Authors:  Fredrik Johansson; Germund Hesslow; Javier F Medina
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2016-04

6.  Theoretical considerations for understanding a Purkinje cell timing mechanism.

Authors:  Fredrik Johansson; Germund Hesslow
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2014-12-31

Review 7.  Are Purkinje Cell Pauses Drivers of Classically Conditioned Blink Responses?

Authors:  Dan-Anders Jirenhed; Germund Hesslow
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.847

8.  A cerebellar adaptation to uncertain inputs.

Authors:  Andrei Khilkevich; Jose Canton-Josh; Evan DeLord; Michael D Mauk
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 14.136

9.  Interaction between Purkinje cells and inhibitory interneurons may create adjustable output waveforms to generate timed cerebellar output.

Authors:  Simon Hong; Lance M Optican
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.