Literature DB >> 10594029

Establishment of distinct MyoD, E2A, and twist DNA binding specificities by different basic region-DNA conformations.

T Kophengnavong1, J E Michnowicz, T K Blackwell.   

Abstract

Basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) proteins perform a wide variety of biological functions. Most bHLH proteins recognize the consensus DNA sequence CAN NTG (the E-box consensus sequence is underlined) but acquire further functional specificity by preferring distinct internal and flanking bases. In addition, induction of myogenesis by MyoD-related bHLH proteins depends on myogenic basic region (BR) and BR-HLH junction residues that are not essential for binding to a muscle-specific site, implying that their BRs may be involved in other critical interactions. We have investigated whether the myogenic residues influence DNA sequence recognition and how MyoD, Twist, and their E2A partner proteins prefer distinct CAN NTG sites. In MyoD, the myogenic BR residues establish specificity for particular CAN NTG sites indirectly, by influencing the conformation through which the BR helix binds DNA. An analysis of DNA binding by BR and junction mutants suggests that an appropriate BR-DNA conformation is necessary but not sufficient for myogenesis, supporting the model that additional interactions with this region are important. The sequence specificities of E2A and Twist proteins require the corresponding BR residues. In addition, mechanisms that position the BR allow E2A to prefer distinct half-sites as a heterodimer with MyoD or Twist, indicating that the E2A BR can be directed toward different targets by dimerization with different partners. Our findings indicate that E2A and its partner bHLH proteins bind to CAN NTG sites by adopting particular preferred BR-DNA conformations, from which they derive differences in sequence recognition that can be important for functional specificity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10594029      PMCID: PMC85082          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.20.1.261-272.2000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  60 in total

1.  Mutations that disrupt DNA binding and dimer formation in the E47 helix-loop-helix protein map to distinct domains.

Authors:  A Voronova; D Baltimore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  HLH forced dimers: tethering MyoD to E47 generates a dominant positive myogenic factor insulated from negative regulation by Id.

Authors:  L A Neuhold; B Wold
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1993-09-24       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  The MyoD DNA binding domain contains a recognition code for muscle-specific gene activation.

Authors:  R L Davis; P F Cheng; A B Lassar; H Weintraub
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1990-03-09       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Interactions between heterologous helix-loop-helix proteins generate complexes that bind specifically to a common DNA sequence.

Authors:  C Murre; P S McCaw; H Vaessin; M Caudy; L Y Jan; Y N Jan; C V Cabrera; J N Buskin; S D Hauschka; A B Lassar
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1989-08-11       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  A new DNA binding and dimerization motif in immunoglobulin enhancer binding, daughterless, MyoD, and myc proteins.

Authors:  C Murre; P S McCaw; D Baltimore
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1989-03-10       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  A cellular factor stimulates the DNA-binding activity of MyoD and E47.

Authors:  M J Thayer; H Weintraub
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-07-15       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Target specificities of Drosophila enhancer of split basic helix-loop-helix proteins.

Authors:  B H Jennings; D M Tyler; S J Bray
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Binding of myc proteins to canonical and noncanonical DNA sequences.

Authors:  T K Blackwell; J Huang; A Ma; L Kretzner; F W Alt; R N Eisenman; H Weintraub
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  High affinity DNA-binding Myc analogs: recognition by an alpha helix.

Authors:  D E Fisher; L A Parent; P A Sharp
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1993-02-12       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Transcription activation by Myc and Max: flanking sequences target activation to a subset of CACGTG motifs in vivo.

Authors:  F Fisher; D H Crouch; P S Jayaraman; W Clark; D A Gillespie; C R Goding
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1993-12-15       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  28 in total

1.  Constitutive instability of muscle regulatory factor Myf5 is distinct from its mitosis-specific disappearance, which requires a D-box-like motif overlapping the basic domain.

Authors:  C Lindon; O Albagli; P Domeyne; D Montarras; C Pinset
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Drosophila lilliputian is required for proneural gene expression in retinal development.

Authors:  Ginnene M Distefano; Andrew J Gangemi; Preeti J Khandelwal; Aleister J Saunders; Daniel R Marenda
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 3.780

3.  The proneural proteins Atonal and Scute regulate neural target genes through different E-box binding sites.

Authors:  Lynn M Powell; Petra I Zur Lage; David R A Prentice; Biruntha Senthinathan; Andrew P Jarman
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Determinants of myogenic specificity within MyoD are required for noncanonical E box binding.

Authors:  Analeah B Heidt; Anabel Rojas; Ian S Harris; Brian L Black
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2007-06-11       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Computational modeling on the recognition of the HRE motif by HIF-1: molecular docking and molecular dynamics studies.

Authors:  Pandian Sokkar; Vani Sathis; Murugesan Ramachandran
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 1.810

6.  Myogenic enhancers regulate expression of the facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy-associated DUX4 gene.

Authors:  Charis L Himeda; Céline Debarnot; Sachiko Homma; Mary Lou Beermann; Jeffrey B Miller; Peter L Jones; Takako I Jones
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Id4 suppresses MMP2-mediated invasion of glioblastoma-derived cells by direct inactivation of Twist1 function.

Authors:  G J Rahme; M A Israel
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 9.867

8.  Requirement of the fusogenic micropeptide myomixer for muscle formation in zebrafish.

Authors:  Jun Shi; Pengpeng Bi; Jimin Pei; Hui Li; Nick V Grishin; Rhonda Bassel-Duby; Elizabeth H Chen; Eric N Olson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  MyoD and E-protein heterodimers switch rhabdomyosarcoma cells from an arrested myoblast phase to a differentiated state.

Authors:  Zhihong Yang; Kyle L MacQuarrie; Erwin Analau; Ashlee E Tyler; F Jeffery Dilworth; Yi Cao; Scott J Diede; Stephen J Tapscott
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2009-03-15       Impact factor: 11.361

10.  Specificity of Atonal and Scute bHLH factors: analysis of cognate E box binding sites and the influence of Senseless.

Authors:  Lynn M Powell; Aimée M Deaton; Martin A Wear; Andrew P Jarman
Journal:  Genes Cells       Date:  2008-08-04       Impact factor: 1.891

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.