Literature DB >> 10594017

Genetic analysis of mouse embryonic stem cells bearing Msh3 and Msh2 single and compound mutations.

A Abuin1, H Zhang, A Bradley.   

Abstract

We have previously described the use of homologous recombination and CRE-loxP-mediated marker recycling to generate mouse embryonic stem (ES) cell lines homozygous for mutations at the Msh3, Msh2, and both Msh3 and Msh2 loci (2). In this study, we describe the analysis of these ES cells with respect to processes known to be affected by DNA mismatch repair. ES cells homozygous for the Msh2 mutation displayed increased resistance to killing by the cytotoxic drug 6-thioguanine (6TG), indicating that the 6TG cytotoxic mechanism is mediated by Msh2. The mutation rate of the herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase 1 (HSV-tk1) gene was unchanged in Msh3-deficient ES cell lines but markedly elevated in Msh2-deficient and Msh3 Msh2 double-mutant cells. Notably, the HSV-tk1 mutation rate was 11-fold higher, on average, than that of the hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase (Hprt) locus in Msh2-deficient cells. Sequence analysis of HSV-tk1 mutants from these cells indicated the presence of a frameshift hotspot within the HSV-tk1 coding region. Msh3-deficient cells displayed a modest (16-fold) elevation in the instability of a dinucleotide repeat, whereas Msh2-deficient and Msh2 Msh3 double-mutant cells displayed markedly increased levels of repeat instability. Targeting frequencies of nonisogenic vectors were elevated in Msh2-deficient ES cell lines, confirming the role of Msh2 in blocking recombination between diverged sequences (homeologous recombination) in mammalian cells. These results are consistent with accumulating data from other laboratories and support the current model of DNA mismatch repair in mammalian cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10594017      PMCID: PMC85070          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.20.1.149-157.2000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  45 in total

1.  Genomic DNA microextraction: a method to screen numerous samples.

Authors:  R Ramírez-Solis; J Rivera-Pérez; J D Wallace; M Wims; H Zheng; A Bradley
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.365

Review 2.  Biochemistry and genetics of eukaryotic mismatch repair.

Authors:  R Kolodner
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1996-06-15       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Recycling selectable markers in mouse embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  A Abuin; A Bradley
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  The barrier to recombination between Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium is disrupted in mismatch-repair mutants.

Authors:  C Rayssiguier; D S Thaler; M Radman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1989-11-23       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Gene targeting in embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  R Ramírez-Solis; A C Davis; A Bradley
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.600

6.  Mutation of MSH3 in endometrial cancer and evidence for its functional role in heteroduplex repair.

Authors:  J I Risinger; A Umar; J Boyd; A Berchuck; T A Kunkel; J C Barrett
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Somatic frameshift mutations in the BAX gene in colon cancers of the microsatellite mutator phenotype.

Authors:  N Rampino; H Yamamoto; Y Ionov; Y Li; H Sawai; J C Reed; M Perucho
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-02-14       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  Mismatch repair and cancer susceptibility.

Authors:  R D Kolodner; E Alani
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 9.740

9.  Mutator phenotypes in human colorectal carcinoma cell lines.

Authors:  N P Bhattacharyya; A Skandalis; A Ganesh; J Groden; M Meuth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-07-05       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Mismatch correction acts as a barrier to homeologous recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  E M Selva; L New; G F Crouse; R S Lahue
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  23 in total

Review 1.  Roles for mismatch repair factors in regulating genetic recombination.

Authors:  E Evans; E Alani
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Activation of Akt/protein kinase B overcomes a G(2)/m cell cycle checkpoint induced by DNA damage.

Authors:  Eugene S Kandel; Jennifer Skeen; Nathan Majewski; Antonio Di Cristofano; Pier Paolo Pandolfi; Claudine S Feliciano; Andrei Gartel; Nissim Hay
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 3.  Mechanisms of gene targeting in higher eukaryotes.

Authors:  Akinori Tokunaga; Hirofumi Anai; Katsuhiro Hanada
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 9.261

4.  MSH3 mediates sensitization of colorectal cancer cells to cisplatin, oxaliplatin, and a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor.

Authors:  Masanobu Takahashi; Minoru Koi; Francesc Balaguer; C Richard Boland; Ajay Goel
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Inactivation of Exonuclease 1 in mice results in DNA mismatch repair defects, increased cancer susceptibility, and male and female sterility.

Authors:  Kaichun Wei; Alan B Clark; Edmund Wong; Michael F Kane; Dan J Mazur; Tchaiko Parris; Nadine K Kolas; Robert Russell; Harry Hou; Burkhard Kneitz; Guohze Yang; Thomas A Kunkel; Richard D Kolodner; Paula E Cohen; Winfried Edelmann
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 6.  Mechanisms maintaining genomic integrity in embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Elisia D Tichy
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2011-07-18

Review 7.  Present state and future perspectives of using pluripotent stem cells in toxicology research.

Authors:  Anna M Wobus; Peter Löser
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 5.153

8.  The piggyBac transposon displays local and distant reintegration preferences and can cause mutations at noncanonical integration sites.

Authors:  Meng Amy Li; Stephen J Pettitt; Sabine Eckert; Zemin Ning; Stephen Rice; Juan Cadiñanos; Kosuke Yusa; Nathalie Conte; Allan Bradley
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Limitations of the Driver/Passenger Model in Cancer Prevention.

Authors:  Mary K Kuhner; Rumen Kostadinov; Brian J Reid
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2016-03-01

10.  The rate and spectrum of microsatellite mutation in Caenorhabditis elegans and Daphnia pulex.

Authors:  Amanda L Seyfert; Melania E A Cristescu; Linda Frisse; Sarah Schaack; W Kelley Thomas; Michael Lynch
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.