Literature DB >> 10593029

Sterilizable syringes: excessive risk or cost-effective option?

A Battersby1, R Feilden, C Nelson.   

Abstract

In recent years, many poorer countries have chosen to use disposable instead of sterilizable syringes. Unfortunately, the infrastructure and management systems that are vital if disposables are to be used safely do not exist. WHO estimates that up to 30% of injections administered are unsafe. The traditional sterilizable syringe had many disadvantages, some of which have been minimized through better design and the use of modern materials; others have been overcome because staff are able to demonstrate that they have performed safely. For example, the time-steam saturation-temperature (TST) indicator has enabled staff to demonstrate that a sterilizing cycle has been successfully completed. Health facility staff must be able to sterilize equipment, and the sterilizable syringe remains the least costly means of administering an injection. Data from countries that have acceptable systems for processing clinical waste indicate that safe and environmentally acceptable disposal, destruction and final containment cost nearly as much as the original cost of a disposable syringe. By careful supervision of staff behaviour and good management, some countries have demonstrated that they are able to administer safe injections with sterilizable syringes at a price they can afford.

Keywords:  Behavior; Biology; Cost Benefit Analysis; Cost Effectiveness; Equipment And Supplies; Evaluation; Evaluation Indexes; Quantitative Evaluation; Risk Behavior; Risk Factors; Summary Report; Syringe

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10593029      PMCID: PMC2557749     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull World Health Organ        ISSN: 0042-9686            Impact factor:   9.408


  6 in total

1.  Immunization safety: A global priority - a major contribution of Canada's international immunization efforts.

Authors:  P Duclos; Y Bergevin
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.253

2.  The Ethics of the Reuse of Disposable Medical Supplies.

Authors:  Anjan Kumar Das; Taketoshi Okita; Aya Enzo; Atsushi Asai
Journal:  Asian Bioeth Rev       Date:  2020-04-12

3.  A global health partnership's use of time-limited support to catalyze health practice change: the case of GAVI's Injection Safety Support.

Authors:  Ann Levin; Arnold Fang; Peter M Hansen; David Pyle; Ousmane Dia; Nina Schwalbe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Plastics and environmental health: the road ahead.

Authors:  Emily J North; Rolf U Halden
Journal:  Rev Environ Health       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.458

5.  Knowledge and Self-Reported Practice of Insulin Injection Device Disposal among Diabetes Patients in Gondar Town, Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Abebe Basazn Mekuria; Begashaw Melaku Gebresillassie; Daniel Asfaw Erku; Kaleab Taye Haile; Eshetie Melese Birru
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2016-09-25       Impact factor: 4.011

6.  A descriptive study on evaluation of bio-medical waste management in a tertiary care public hospital of North India.

Authors:  Rajiv Kumar; Anil Kumar Gupta; Arun Kumar Aggarwal; Ashok Kumar
Journal:  J Environ Health Sci Eng       Date:  2014-04-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.