Literature DB >> 10592764

Response evaluation of bone metastases in breast cancer: value of magnetic resonance imaging.

P Saip1, N Tenekeci, A Aydiner, M Dinçer, S Inanç, C Demir, E N Oral, E Topuz.   

Abstract

The clinical utility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in judging therapeutic response of bone metastases was evaluated in 18 patients with advanced breast cancer. Treatment efficacy was assessed by MRI and conventional methods such as plain radiograph, bone scan, pain and analgesic scale, and serum CA15-3. The response by MRI was evaluated mainly on T1-weighted sequences by measuring the volume of the bone lesion and soft tissue component. The patient was assumed to be a conventional responder if a complete or partial response was observed in any of the conventional methods described above. Response was most concordant between plain radiographs and MRI findings (91%, 10/11, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 58.7-99.8). The rate of concordance was 61% (11/18, 95% CI 35.8-82.7) for all conventional methods and MRI. MRI revealed response in four patients in whom progressive disease was observed by bone scan and the marker response was not measurable. This pilot study suggests that posttherapy evaluation with MRI may provide useful clinical information in breast cancer patients with bone metastases and may be a valuable adjunct to conventional methods with conflicting results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10592764     DOI: 10.3109/07357909909032842

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Invest        ISSN: 0735-7907            Impact factor:   2.176


  6 in total

Review 1.  MRI for response assessment in metastatic bone disease.

Authors:  F E Lecouvet; A Larbi; V Pasoglou; P Omoumi; B Tombal; N Michoux; J Malghem; R Lhommel; B C Vande Berg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Follow-up CT and MR findings of osteoblastic spinal metastatic lesions after stereotactic radiotherapy.

Authors:  Yoon Joon Hwang
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound for the treatment of painful bone metastases: role of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI in the assessment of clinical outcome.

Authors:  Michele Anzidei; Alessandro Napoli; Beatrice Sacconi; Fabrizio Boni; Vincenzo Noce; Michele Di Martino; Luca Saba; Carlo Catalano
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 4.  Imaging response to systemic therapy for bone metastases.

Authors:  Tobias Bäuerle; Wolfhard Semmler
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Improved estimates of strength and stiffness in pathologic vertebrae with bone metastases using CT-derived bone density compared with radiographic bone lesion quality classification.

Authors:  Ron N Alkalay; Michael W Groff; Marc A Stadelmann; Florian M Buck; Sven Hoppe; Nicolas Theumann; Umesh Mektar; Roger B Davis; David B Hackney
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2021-09-03

6.  Conventional finite element models estimate the strength of metastatic human vertebrae despite alterations of the bone's tissue and structure.

Authors:  Marc A Stadelmann; Denis E Schenk; Ghislain Maquer; Christopher Lenherr; Florian M Buck; Dieter D Bosshardt; Sven Hoppe; Nicolas Theumann; Ron N Alkalay; Philippe K Zysset
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 4.626

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.