Literature DB >> 10592154

Random errors in localization of landmarks in postero-anterior cephalograms.

A E Athanasiou1, R Miethke, A J Van Der Meij.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the random error in localization of the most common landmarks in postero-anterior cephalograms (PAC). The study took place at the Department of Orthodontics of Aarhus University during the period 1993-1995. The material consisted of 30 standardized PAC taken in natural head position. Five examiners had to identify 34 landmarks on each cephalogram. Subsequently, all examiners had to identify again the same 34 landmarks on one randomly selected cephalogram five times with a time interval of at least 24 hours. All landmarks were digitized, related to an X-Y co-ordinate system, and an arithmetical mean was calculated. The accuracy of digitizing was evaluated by digitizing one randomly selected cephalogram 10 times. The main findings of this study are: (1) The digitizing error is negligible compared to the errors introduced by landmark identification. (2) Each landmark has its own characteristic pattern of variance, which is very similar on both sides. (3) Significant differences in accuracy exist between the various postero-anterior landmarks. The six most accurate landmarks are mastoid left (l) and right (r), latero-orbitale (l) and (r), and antegonion (l) and (r). The six least accurate landmarks are coronoid (l) and (r), condylar (l) and (r), and mandibular foramen (l) and (r). (4) A significant difference in the accuracy of landmark identification between the five examiners was only seen for seven of the 34 landmarks. (5) No evidence was found that one examiner was consistently better/worse than the others. (6) No improvement in the accuracy was found after repeated identification, thus there seems to be no short-term 'learning process'. Refereed Paper

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10592154     DOI: 10.1093/ortho/26.4.273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Orthod        ISSN: 0301-228X


  5 in total

1.  Influence of a programme of professional calibration in the variability of landmark identification using cone beam computed tomography-synthesized and conventional radiographic cephalograms.

Authors:  E L Delamare; G S Liedke; M B Vizzotto; H L D da Silveira; J L D Ribeiro; H E D Silveira
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  In vivo comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms.

Authors:  Vandana Kumar; John Ludlow; Lucia Helena Soares Cevidanes; André Mol
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Change of mandibular position during two-phase orthodontic treatment of skeletal class II in the Chinese population.

Authors:  Rhonda Nga Yi Cheung; Urban Hägg; Ricky Wing Kit Wong; Chongshan Liao; Yanqi Yang
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2015-01-28

4.  Benefits of lateral cephalogram during landmark identification on posteroanterior cephalograms.

Authors:  Sel-Ae Hwang; Jae-Seo Lee; Hyeon-Shik Hwang; Kyung-Min Lee
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 1.372

5.  A comparative study of the reproducibility of landmark identification on posteroanterior and anteroposterior cephalograms generated from cone-beam computed tomography scans.

Authors:  Eui-Ri Na; Hussein Aljawad; Kyung-Min Lee; Hyeon-Shik Hwang
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 1.372

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.