Literature DB >> 10591908

Timing a one-handed catch. I. Effects of telestereoscopic viewing.

S Bennett1, J van der Kamp, G J Savelsbergh, K Davids.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the role of binocular and monocular information sources in specifying time-to-contact. More specifically, it was investigated whether the timing of the one-handed catch is consistent with a binocular tau-function strategy. Subjects (n=8) were required to time their grasp to catch a ball approaching with a constant spatial trajectory. The ball approached at three different constant velocities (1.5, 2.0 and 2.5 m/s). Vergence and disparity were manipulated through subjects wearing a telestereoscope to increase the effective interocular separation, under both binocular and monocular viewing. Subjects performed 24 trials in each of the four conditions. Subjects' started the opening of the hand earlier in the binocular telestereoscope condition when a ball approached with velocity of 1. 5 m/s. They then closed the hand earlier in the binocular telestereoscope condition at all ball approach velocities. There were no effects of telestereoscope on the timing of hand opening and closing under monocular viewing. This finding suggests the use of the binocular information in timing the grasp. However, there were effects of approach velocity under all conditions of monocular and binocular viewing. Subjects' closed the hand earlier as a function of increasing approach velocity. Together, the effects of the telestereoscope and approach velocity indicate that timing of the one-handed catch is not consistent with the use of a binocular "tau-function" variable. Rather, it is concluded that multiple sources of monocular and binocular information contribute to the regulation of timing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10591908     DOI: 10.1007/s002210050904

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  8 in total

1.  Modelling the control of interceptive actions.

Authors:  P J Beek; J C Dessing; C E Peper; D Bullock
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-09-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  The contribution of stereo vision to one-handed catching.

Authors:  Liesbeth I N Mazyn; Matthieu Lenoir; Gilles Montagne; Geert J P Savelsbergh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-06-25       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Catching optical information for the regulation of timing.

Authors:  S R Caljouw; J van der Kamp; G J P Savelsbergh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-02-04       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Timing of goal-directed hitting: impact requirements change the information-movement coupling.

Authors:  Simone R Caljouw; John van der Kamp; Geert J P Savelsbergh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-02-04       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Eye movements influence estimation of time-to-contact in prediction motion.

Authors:  Simon J Bennett; Robin Baures; Heiko Hecht; Nicolas Benguigui
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  To know or not to know: influence of explicit advance knowledge of occlusion on interceptive actions.

Authors:  Pieter Tijtgat; Simon J Bennett; Geert J P Savelsbergh; Dirk De Clercq; Matthieu Lenoir
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Independence of Size and Distance in Binocular Vision.

Authors:  Nam-Gyoon Kim
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-06-25

8.  The relationship between the body and the environment in the virtual world: The interpupillary distance affects the body size perception.

Authors:  Daisuke Mine; Nami Ogawa; Takuji Narumi; Kazuhiko Yokosawa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.