Literature DB >> 10591838

Changes in bone mass and bone turnover following distal forearm fracture.

B M Ingle1, S M Hay, H M Bottjer, R Eastell.   

Abstract

Bone loss occurs close to a fracture and is associated with increased bone turnover. Fracture healing itself results in increased markers of bone turnover. But the exact patterns of these changes after different fractures are unclear. We aimed to investigate the changes in bone density and biochemical markers following distal forearm fracture. Twenty women (mean age 63 years) were recruited following fracture of the distal radius and ulna. Bone mineral density (BMD) of the hand and forearm were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and quantitative ultrasound (QUS) of the fingers was measured at 0, 6, 12, 26 and 52 weeks after fracture. Serum and urine samples were collected at 0, 3 and 7 days and at 2, 4, 6, 12, 26 and 52 weeks after fracture to measure markers of bone turnover. For bone formation we measured: bone alkaline phosphatase (iBAP), osteocalcin (Oc), procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP); and for bone resorption: tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAcP), free deoxypyridinoline (iFDpd), N-telopeptides of type I collagen (NTx). We used the nonfractured limb to calculate values for baseline BMD and amplitude-dependent speed of sound (AD-SoS). There was a decrease in BMD at the hand and in AD-SoS of the fingers after forearm fracture (p<0.001). This bone loss was maximal for BMD by 6 weeks at 9% (p<0. 001) and remained decreased at 52 weeks. AD-SoS decreased at 12 weeks by 3% (p<0.01) and recovered completely by 52 weeks. Bone formation markers increased between 2 and 4 weeks by 13-52% (p<0. 001), and were still elevated at 52 weeks. Bone resorption markers increased between 2 and 6 weeks by 18-35% and returned to baseline at 52 weeks (TRAcP remained elevated). We conclude that BMD decreased distal and immediately proximal to the fracture line when measured with DXA and QUS. Bone loss after distal forearm fracture did not recover by 52 weeks and most bone turnover markers did not return to baseline.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10591838     DOI: 10.1007/s001980050246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  27 in total

1.  Bone loss from the hand in women following distal forearm fracture.

Authors:  W Pluskiewicz; B Drozdzowska; G Sianos
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Changes in bone mass and bone turnover following tibial shaft fracture.

Authors:  S W Veitch; S C Findlay; A J Hamer; A Blumsohn; Richard Eastell; B M Ingle
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  In vivo assessment of bone quality in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Joshua N Farr; Matthew T Drake; Shreyasee Amin; L Joseph Melton; Louise K McCready; Sundeep Khosla
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 4.  Biological perspectives of delayed fracture healing.

Authors:  K D Hankenson; G Zimmerman; R Marcucio
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.586

5.  Serum 25(OH)D is associated with an altered bone turnover marker response after a hip fracture.

Authors:  Christopher C Stewart; Nathan N O'Hara; Denise Orwig; Marc C Hochberg; Sheila Sprague; Jay Magaziner; Gerard P Slobogean
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Osteocalcin synthesis by human osteoblasts from normal and osteoarthritic bone after vitamin D3 stimulation.

Authors:  Francesco Paolo Cantatore; Addolorata Corrado; Maria Grano; Laura Quarta; Silvia Colucci; Nadia Melillo
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Biomarkers of bone turnover in diagnosis and therapy of osteoporosis: a consensus advice from an Austrian working group.

Authors:  Christian Bieglmayer; Hans Peter Dimai; Rudolf Wolfgang Gasser; Stefan Kudlacek; Barbara Obermayer-Pietsch; Wolfgang Woloszczuk; Elisabeth Zwettler; Andrea Griesmacher
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2012-08-14

Review 8.  Recent advances in the use of serological bone formation markers to monitor callus development and fracture healing.

Authors:  Marlon O Coulibaly; Debra L Sietsema; Travis A Burgers; Jim Mason; Bart O Williams; Clifford B Jones
Journal:  Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.807

9.  Predictors of bone loss after hip fracture.

Authors:  Lois E Wehren; William G Hawkes; J Richard Hebel; Denise Orwig; Sheryl I Zimmerman; Kathleen M Fox; Janet Yu-Yahiro; Jay Magaziner
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-12-05       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Management strategy for symptomatic bisphosphonate-associated incomplete atypical femoral fractures.

Authors:  Anas Saleh; Vishal V Hegde; Anish G Potty; Robert Schneider; Charles N Cornell; Joseph M Lane
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2012-05-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.