Literature DB >> 10590397

Evaluation of selected characteristics of pregnancy drug registries.

M A Honein1, L J Paulozzi, J D Cragan, A Correa.   

Abstract

Given that half of U.S. pregnancies are unintended and some prescription drugs are frequently used by reproductive-age women, there is an increasing interest in establishing pregnancy registries to monitor fetal exposures and pregnancy outcomes. Physicians report prenatal exposures and pregnancy outcomes, including birth defects, to these registries. We compared pooled data from four pregnancy registries with data from a population-based birth defects surveillance system, the Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program (MACDP); specifically we compared the defect prevalence by organ system and severity, the number of defects per baby, and timeliness. We also compared the number of zidovudine exposures identified by a registry to the number identified by 29 states with HIV surveillance. The registries' overall defect prevalence (41/1471, 2.7%) was slightly lower than MACDP (6157/195642, 3.2%). The defect prevalence by organ system was similar, except for genitourinary defects which had a lower prevalence in the registries than in MACDP (RR = 0.22; 95% CI = 0.07,0.67). The prevalence of having an internal defect or severe defect reported was lower in the registries (RR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.53,1.06, and RR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0. 57,1.19, respectively). The mean number of defects identified per affected infant was 2.82 in MACDP and 1.68 in the registries. Both systems received 69% of defect reports by 6 months after birth. In similar 6-month periods, U.S. HIV surveillance identified 300 prenatal zidovudine exposures, while the registry received 134 worldwide reports. If registries improve their ascertainment of defects and exposed pregnancies, they will increase their chance of detecting signs of possible teratogenicity. Teratology 60:356-364, 1999. Published 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10590397     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9926(199912)60:6<356::AID-TERA8>3.0.CO;2-B

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Teratology        ISSN: 0040-3709


  18 in total

Review 1.  Safety of sumatriptan in pregnancy: a review of the data so far.

Authors:  Elizabeth Loder
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.749

2.  Are epidemiological approaches suitable to study risk/preventive factors for human birth defects?

Authors:  Sonia Hernandez-Diaz; Anna Sara Oberg
Journal:  Curr Epidemiol Rep       Date:  2015-03

3.  Using current evidence in selecting antiepileptic drugs for use during pregnancy.

Authors:  Page B Pennell
Journal:  Epilepsy Curr       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 7.500

Review 4.  Data resources for investigating drug exposure during pregnancy and associated outcomes: the General Practice Research Database (GPRD) as an alternative to pregnancy registries.

Authors:  Rachel A Charlton; Marianne C Cunnington; Corinne S de Vries; John G Weil
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 5.  Antiretroviral therapy in pregnancy: a focus on safety.

Authors:  G P Taylor; N Low-Beer
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 6.  Use of real-world evidence from healthcare utilization data to evaluate drug safety during pregnancy.

Authors:  Krista F Huybrechts; Brian T Bateman; Sonia Hernández-Díaz
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 2.890

Review 7.  Statins and pregnancy: between supposed risks and theoretical benefits.

Authors:  Edouard Lecarpentier; Olivier Morel; Thierry Fournier; Elisabeth Elefant; Pascale Chavatte-Palmer; Vassilis Tsatsaris
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Comparing the General Practice Research Database and the UK Epilepsy and Pregnancy Register as tools for postmarketing teratogen surveillance: anticonvulsants and the risk of major congenital malformations.

Authors:  Rachel A Charlton; John G Weil; Marianne C Cunnington; Sayantani Ray; Corinne S de Vries
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 9.  Pregnancy exposure registries.

Authors:  Dianne L Kennedy; Kathleen Uhl; Sandra L Kweder
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.606

10.  Monitoring outcomes of pregnancy following drug exposure: a company-based pregnancy registry program.

Authors:  Kristine E Shields; Bengt-Erik Wiholm; Linda S Hostelley; Linda F Striano; Sam R Arena; Robert G Sharrar
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.606

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.