BACKGROUND: Guidelines for follow-up of melanoma patients are not established. In 1987, a follow-up protocol was instituted at the Yale Melanoma Unit to improve upon the detection of disease recurrence in patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer Stage I-III cutaneous melanoma. The follow-up protocol consists of a patient education program and a surveillance schedule based on stage of disease. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed the records of 373 patients who were seen and followed according to the surveillance protocol in the Yale Melanoma Unit between January 1988 and December 1994 to determine 1) the time interval between the initial visit and recurrence; 2) the most common method of detecting recurrences; 3) whether the surveillance schedule or the patient detects more recurrences, i.e., asymptomatic recurrences versus symptomatic recurrences; 4) whether there is any survival difference between asymptomatic and symptomatic recurrences. RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival rates for Stage I, II, and III patients were 95%, 72%, and 52%, respectively. Of the 78 recurrences, 44 (56%) were detected by physician-directed surveillance examinations and 34 (44%) by patients. Most recurrences were found within the first (47%) or second (32%) year of follow-up. The estimated 6-month hazard rates for death or recurrence were 0.0044, 0.0088, and 0.0278 for Stage I, II, and III patients, respectively. The group of asymptomatic patients with recurrence had a survival advantage over the symptomatic recurrence group. In addition, patients with locoregional recurrence had better survival than those with distant recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Although many recurrences arise rapidly and are recognized early by patients, in this study more than half were found by surveillance examinations before symptoms were manifest. Based on the hazard ratio for recurrences, the authors recommend the following surveillance schedules in addition to the patient education program for detection of recurrences: 1) Stage I, annually; 2) Stage II, every 6 months for Years 1-2 and annually thereafter; 3) Stage III, every 3 months for Year 1, every 4 months for Year 2, and every 6 months for Years 3-5; 4) at Year 6 and beyond, all patients should have surveillance annually, due to the risk of late recurrence and/or metachronous multiple primaries. Copyright 1999 American Cancer Society.
BACKGROUND: Guidelines for follow-up of melanomapatients are not established. In 1987, a follow-up protocol was instituted at the Yale Melanoma Unit to improve upon the detection of disease recurrence in patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer Stage I-III cutaneous melanoma. The follow-up protocol consists of a patient education program and a surveillance schedule based on stage of disease. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed the records of 373 patients who were seen and followed according to the surveillance protocol in the Yale Melanoma Unit between January 1988 and December 1994 to determine 1) the time interval between the initial visit and recurrence; 2) the most common method of detecting recurrences; 3) whether the surveillance schedule or the patient detects more recurrences, i.e., asymptomatic recurrences versus symptomatic recurrences; 4) whether there is any survival difference between asymptomatic and symptomatic recurrences. RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival rates for Stage I, II, and III patients were 95%, 72%, and 52%, respectively. Of the 78 recurrences, 44 (56%) were detected by physician-directed surveillance examinations and 34 (44%) by patients. Most recurrences were found within the first (47%) or second (32%) year of follow-up. The estimated 6-month hazard rates for death or recurrence were 0.0044, 0.0088, and 0.0278 for Stage I, II, and III patients, respectively. The group of asymptomatic patients with recurrence had a survival advantage over the symptomatic recurrence group. In addition, patients with locoregional recurrence had better survival than those with distant recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Although many recurrences arise rapidly and are recognized early by patients, in this study more than half were found by surveillance examinations before symptoms were manifest. Based on the hazard ratio for recurrences, the authors recommend the following surveillance schedules in addition to the patient education program for detection of recurrences: 1) Stage I, annually; 2) Stage II, every 6 months for Years 1-2 and annually thereafter; 3) Stage III, every 3 months for Year 1, every 4 months for Year 2, and every 6 months for Years 3-5; 4) at Year 6 and beyond, all patients should have surveillance annually, due to the risk of late recurrence and/or metachronous multiple primaries. Copyright 1999 American Cancer Society.
Authors: Harriet M Kluger; Kathleen Hoyt; Antonella Bacchiocchi; Tina Mayer; Jonathan Kirsch; Yuval Kluger; Mario Sznol; Stephan Ariyan; Annette Molinaro; Ruth Halaban Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-04-12 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Rajmohan Murali; Chris Goumas; Anne Kricker; Lynn From; Klaus J Busam; Colin B Begg; Terence Dwyer; Stephen B Gruber; Peter A Kanetsky; Irene Orlow; Stefano Rosso; Nancy E Thomas; Marianne Berwick; Richard A Scolyer; Bruce K Armstrong Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2011-09-13 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Urvi J Mujumdar; Jennifer L Hay; Yvette C Monroe-Hinds; Amanda J Hummer; Colin B Begg; Homer B Wilcox; Susan A Oliveria; Marianne Berwick Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Kate D Cromwell; Merrick I Ross; Yan Xing; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Richard E Royal; Anthony Lucci; Jeffrey E Lee; Janice N Cormier Journal: Melanoma Res Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 3.599