Literature DB >> 10587439

Identification of surface residues of the monocyte chemotactic protein 1 that affect signaling through the receptor CCR2.

K Jarnagin1, D Grunberger, M Mulkins, B Wong, S Hemmerich, C Paavola, A Bloom, S Bhakta, F Diehl, R Freedman, D McCarley, I Polsky, A Ping-Tsou, A Kosaka, T M Handel.   

Abstract

The CC chemokine, monocyte chemotactic protein, 1 (MCP-1) functions as a major chemoattractant for T-cells and monocytes by interacting with the seven-transmembrane G protein-coupled receptor CCR2. To identify which residues of MCP-1 contribute to signaling though CCR2, we mutated all the surface-exposed residues to alanine and other amino acids and made some selective large changes at the amino terminus. We then characterized the impact of these mutations on three postreceptor pathways involving inhibition of cAMP synthesis, stimulation of cytosolic calcium influx, and chemotaxis. The results highlight several important features of the signaling process and the correlation between binding and signaling: The amino terminus of MCP-1 is essential as truncation of residues 2-8 ([1+9-76]hMCP-1) results in a protein that cannot stimulate chemotaxis. However, the exact peptide sequence may be unimportant as individual alanine mutations or simultaneous replacement of residues 3-6 with alanine had little effect. Y13 is also important and must be a large nonpolar residue for chemotaxis to occur. Interestingly, both Y13 and [1+9-76]hMCP-1 are high-affinity binders and thus affinity of these mutants is not correlated with ability to promote chemotaxis. For the other surface residues there is a strong correlation between binding affinity and agonist potency in all three signaling pathways. Perhaps the most interesting observation is that although Y13A and [1+9-76]hMCP are antagonists of chemotaxis, they are agonists of pathways involving inhibition of cAMP synthesis and, in the case of Y13A, calcium influx. These results demonstrate that these two well-known signaling events are not sufficient to drive chemotaxis. Furthermore, it suggests that specific molecular features of MCP-1 induce different conformations in CCR2 that are coupled to separate postreceptor pathways. Therefore, by judicious design of antagonists, it should be possible to trap CCR2 in conformational states that are unable to stimulate all of the pathways required for chemotaxis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10587439     DOI: 10.1021/bi9912239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  33 in total

1.  Probing the role of CXC motif in chemokine CXCL8 for high affinity binding and activation of CXCR1 and CXCR2 receptors.

Authors:  Prem Raj B Joseph; Jose M Sarmiento; Anurag K Mishra; Sandhya T Das; Roberto P Garofalo; Javier Navarro; Krishna Rajarathnam
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  Structure, function and physiological consequences of virally encoded chemokine seven transmembrane receptors.

Authors:  M M Rosenkilde; M J Smit; M Waldhoer
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2008-01-21       Impact factor: 8.739

3.  Allosteric and orthosteric sites in CC chemokine receptor (CCR5), a chimeric receptor approach.

Authors:  Stefanie Thiele; Anne Steen; Pia C Jensen; Jacek Mokrosinski; Thomas M Frimurer; Mette M Rosenkilde
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 4.  Chemokine oligomerization and interactions with receptors and glycosaminoglycans: the role of structural dynamics in function.

Authors:  C L Salanga; T M Handel
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  2011-01-09       Impact factor: 3.905

5.  Functional anatomy of the full-length CXCR4-CXCL12 complex systematically dissected by quantitative model-guided mutagenesis.

Authors:  Bryan S Stephens; Tony Ngo; Irina Kufareva; Tracy M Handel
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 8.192

Review 6.  Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers of Alzheimer's Disease: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Donovan A McGrowder; Fabian Miller; Kurt Vaz; Chukwuemeka Nwokocha; Cameil Wilson-Clarke; Melisa Anderson-Cross; Jabari Brown; Lennox Anderson-Jackson; Lowen Williams; Lyndon Latore; Rory Thompson; Ruby Alexander-Lindo
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-02-10

Review 7.  Chemokine receptor oligomerization and allostery.

Authors:  Bryan Stephens; Tracy M Handel
Journal:  Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.622

8.  Characterization of the chemokine CXCL11-heparin interaction suggests two different affinities for glycosaminoglycans.

Authors:  India C Severin; Jean-Philippe Gaudry; Zoë Johnson; Andreas Kungl; Ariane Jansma; Bernd Gesslbauer; Barbara Mulloy; Christine Power; Amanda E I Proudfoot; Tracy Handel
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Analysis of an orf virus chemokine-binding protein: Shifting ligand specificities among a family of poxvirus viroceptors.

Authors:  Bruce T Seet; Catherine A McCaughan; Tracy M Handel; Andrew Mercer; Craig Brunetti; Grant McFadden; Stephen B Fleming
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Chemokines and their receptors: insights from molecular modeling and crystallography.

Authors:  Irina Kufareva
Journal:  Curr Opin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 5.547

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.