Literature DB >> 10587222

Comparison of algorithms for multileaf collimator field segmentation.

W Que1.   

Abstract

In the "stop and shoot" method of intensity modulated radiation therapy, it is desirable to use an efficient multileaf collimator (MLC) field segmentation algorithm in the sense that it translates beam intensity maps into the least number of MLC field segments. In this work, we compare the performance of eight different algorithms, including the ones by Bortfeld et al., Galvin et al., Xia and Verhey, the Siemens IMFAST algorithm, and four other algorithms which have not been studied before. We find that the algorithm of Xia and Verhey is most frequently the algorithm that needs the least MLC field segments. However, no single algorithm is the most efficient for all clinical cases or intensity maps. This suggests that it is desirable to have multiple algorithms available in a clinical treatment planning system which will search through all algorithms automatically and find the most efficient delivery sequence for a given treatment. Each intensity map in a treatment could be delivered by a different algorithm, whichever is the most efficient for that map. It is pointed out that when the background intensity level is not zero, it is not always efficient to deliver a segment to bring the background level down to zero.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10587222     DOI: 10.1118/1.598755

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  6 in total

1.  Efficient Intensity Map Splitting Algorithms for Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Xiaodong Wu
Journal:  Inf Process Lett       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 0.959

2.  To evaluate the accuracy of dynamic versus static IMRT delivery using portal dosimetry.

Authors:  S Clemente; R Caivano; M Cozzolino; G Califano; C Chiumento; A Fiorentino; V Fusco
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  A comprehensive formulation for volumetric modulated arc therapy planning.

Authors:  Dan Nguyen; Qihui Lyu; Dan Ruan; Daniel O'Connor; Daniel A Low; Ke Sheng
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  A study of segment weight optimization with the CMS XiO step-and-shoot IMRT technique for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ramachandran Prabhakar; Jim Cramb; Christopher Gehrke; Justin Anderson; Judy Andrews
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Rapid direct aperture optimization via dose influence matrix based piecewise aperture dose model.

Authors:  Xuejiao Zeng; Hao Gao; Xunbin Wei
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Comparison of the KonRad IMRT and XiO treatment planning systems.

Authors:  Bodo Reitz; Moyed Miften
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2008-07-14       Impact factor: 2.102

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.