Literature DB >> 10587129

Comparison of unenhanced, hepatic arterial-dominant, and portal venous-dominant phase helical CT for the detection of liver metastases in women with breast carcinoma.

D H Sheafor1, M G Frederick, E K Paulson, M T Keogan, D M DeLong, R C Nelson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate triple-phase helical CT for detection of hepatic metastases from breast carcinoma. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Breast cancer patients were studied prospectively with triple-phase helical CT in 300 consecutive examinations. Hepatic arterial-dominant and portal venous-dominant phase scans were initiated at 20 and 65 sec, respectively, after IV injection of 175 ml of iopamidol (30 mg/ml) at 5 ml/sec. Three independent observers each reviewed 200 cases of the portal venous-dominant phase for lesion number, conspicuity, and attenuation. Subsequently, portal venous-dominant phase images were reevaluated in conjunction with hepatic arterial-dominant phase or unenhanced images.
RESULTS: Hepatic metastases were identified in 79 (26%) of 300 cases. Lesions detected on portal venous-dominant, hepatic arterial-dominant, and unenhanced images were as follows: observer 1, n = 198, 164, and 171; observer 2, n = 254, 233, and 233; and observer 3, n = 291, 270, and 276 (p > .05). The mean total lesion count was 387, with more lesions detected on portal venous-dominant phase than on either hepatic arterial-dominant phase or unenhanced images (p < .001 and p < .0001, respectively). For individual observers, 10-26% of lesions were hypervascular on hepatic arterial-dominant phase images. Two to 4% of lesions were identified only on hepatic arterial-dominant phase or unenhanced images. However, in these few cases, the lesions either were false-positives or were seen in conjunction with additional metastases on portal venous-dominant images.
CONCLUSION: Routine use of triple-phase CT in patients with breast carcinoma may not be warranted: Addition of the hepatic arterial-dominant phase or unenhanced images revealed few additional lesions in our group of 300 patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10587129     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.172.4.10587129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  10 in total

1.  Re-evaluation of detectability of liver metastases by contrast-enhanced CT: added value of hepatic arterial phase imaging.

Authors:  Yukiko Honda; Toru Higaki; Haruka Higashihori; Yoshio Monzen; Fuminari Tatsugami; Shuji Date; Kazuo Awai
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  Head and neck vascular lesions: characterization of the flow pattern by the use of three-phase CT.

Authors:  Chang-Woo Ryu; Jae Kyun Kim; Sang Joon Kim; Jeong Hyun Lee; Jeoung Hyun Kim; Hong Il Ha; Dae Chul Suh
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 3.500

3.  Detection of liver metastases: gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced three-dimensional dynamic phases and one-hour delayed phase MR imaging versus superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  Young Kon Kim; Jeong Min Lee; Chong Soo Kim; Gyung Ho Chung; Chan Young Kim; In Hee Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-12-29       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Value of CT-Based Radiomics in Predicating the Efficacy of Anti-HER2 Therapy for Patients With Liver Metastases From Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Miao He; Yu Hu; Dongdong Wang; Meili Sun; Huijie Li; Peng Yan; Yingxu Meng; Ran Zhang; Li Li; Dexin Yu; Xiuwen Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 5.738

5.  The imaging viewpoint: how imaging affects determination of progression-free survival.

Authors:  Daniel Carl Sullivan; Lawrence H Schwartz; Binsheng Zhao
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  In defense of body CT.

Authors:  Cynthia H McCollough; Luís Guimarães; Joel G Fletcher
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Diagnostic accuracy of non-contrast abdominopelvic computed tomography scans in follow-up of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Sang Yu Nam; Su Joa Ahn; Young Rock Jang; Yong Soon Chun; Heung Kyu Park; Seung Joon Choi; Hye Young Choi; Jeong Ho Kim
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Neoadjuvant treatment of colorectal liver metastases is associated with altered contrast enhancement on computed tomography.

Authors:  Anne Bethke; Katrin Kühne; Ivan Platzek; Christian Stroszczynski
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 3.909

9.  Non-contrast and portal venous phase computed tomography in breast cancer hepatic metastases: comparison of tumor measurements and impact on response assessment.

Authors:  Brian Flemming; Mark D Kovacs; Andrew Hardie; Melissa Picard; Philip F Burchett; Heather Collins; Douglas H Sheafor
Journal:  Acta Radiol Open       Date:  2021-02-27

10.  The role of unenhanced phase of the liver in the scanning protocol of metastatic breast cancer: implications for sensitivity, response evaluation and size measurement.

Authors:  Juan José Arenas-Jiménez; Elena García-Garrigós; Mariana Cecilia Planells-Alduvín
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 2.991

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.