Literature DB >> 10586570

Can Bartlett's repeated reproduction experiments be replicated?

E T Bergman1, H L Roediger.   

Abstract

Surprisingly, Bartlett's (1932) famous repeated reproduction experiments, in which he found systematically increasing errors in recall from the same people tested over time, have never been successfully replicated. Several studies have attempted partial replications, which were unsuccessful, and their authors concluded that the original observations might not be replicable. We conducted a study modeled closely after Bartlett's procedures: Subjects studied "The War of the Ghosts," took an initial test 15 min later, and then took a delayed test after 1 week. A follow-up test was conducted 6 months later on as many subjects as could be obtained. We did replicate Bartlett's results, in that (1) subjects forgot the story over delays but (2) introduced rationalization and distortion into their accounts of the story, with increases in the proportion of material distorted as retention interval increased. Subjects also imported new propositions at long delays, further confirming Bartlett's empirical observations and conclusions. Bartlett's repeated reproduction results can be replicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10586570     DOI: 10.3758/bf03201224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  5 in total

1.  Learning and retaining verbal material.

Authors:  H KAY
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1955-05

2.  Memory for the pragmatic implications of sentences.

Authors:  W F Brewer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1977-11

3.  Some deleterious consequences of the act of recollection.

Authors:  J W Schooler; R A Foster; E F Loftus
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1988-05

4.  Some experiments relating to Bartlett's theory of remembering.

Authors:  A Gauld; G M Stephenson
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1967-05

5.  Hypermnesia: the role of repeated testing.

Authors:  H L Roediger; D G Payne
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 3.051

  5 in total
  8 in total

Review 1.  Update on memory systems and processes.

Authors:  Lynn Nadel; Oliver Hardt
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 7.853

2.  Remembering all that and then some: recollection of autobiographical memories after a 1-year delay.

Authors:  Jenna Campbell; Lynn Nadel; Devin Duke; Lee Ryan
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2011-05

3.  False Memories for Suggestions: The Impact of Conceptual Elaboration.

Authors:  Maria S Zaragoza; Karen J Mitchell; Kristie Payment; Sarah Drivdahl
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 3.059

4.  Serial reproduction of traumatic events: does the chain unravel?

Authors:  Galit Nahari; Vallery Sheinfeld; Joseph Glicksohn; Israel Nachson
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2014-08-29

5.  Replication and Analysis of Ebbinghaus' Forgetting Curve.

Authors:  Jaap M J Murre; Joeri Dros
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Declarative and Non-declarative Memory Consolidation in Children with Sleep Disorder.

Authors:  Eszter Csábi; Pálma Benedek; Karolina Janacsek; Zsófia Zavecz; Gábor Katona; Dezso Nemeth
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Fact vs. Affect in the Telephone Game: All Levels of Surprise Are Retold With High Accuracy, Even Independently of Facts.

Authors:  Fritz Breithaupt; Binyan Li; Torrin M Liddell; Eleanor B Schille-Hudson; Sarah Whaley
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-11-20

8.  Do reminders of the crime reverse the memory-undermining effect of simulating amnesia?

Authors:  I Mangiulli; T Lanciano; K van Oorsouw; M Jelicic; A Curci
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.