Literature DB >> 10582573

Disk-covering, a fast-converging method for phylogenetic tree reconstruction.

D H Huson1, S M Nettles, T J Warnow.   

Abstract

The evolutionary history of a set of species is represented by a phylogenetic tree, which is a rooted, leaf-labeled tree, where internal nodes represent ancestral species and the leaves represent modern day species. Accurate (or even boundedly inaccurate) topology reconstructions of large and divergent trees from realistic length sequences have long been considered one of the major challenges in systematic biology. In this paper, we present a simple method, the Disk-Covering Method (DCM), which boosts the performance of base phylogenetic methods under various Markov models of evolution. We analyze the performance of DCM-boosted distance methods under the Jukes-Cantor Markov model of biomolecular sequence evolution, and prove that for almost all trees, polylogarithmic length sequences suffice for complete accuracy with high probability, while polynomial length sequences always suffice. We also provide an experimental study based upon simulating sequence evolution on model trees. This study confirms substantial reductions in error rates at realistic sequence lengths.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10582573     DOI: 10.1089/106652799318337

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Biol        ISSN: 1066-5277            Impact factor:   1.479


  20 in total

1.  BCD Beam Search: considering suboptimal partial solutions in Bad Clade Deletion supertrees.

Authors:  Markus Fleischauer; Sebastian Böcker
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 2.984

2.  Distinguishing between hot-spots and melting-pots of genetic diversity using haplotype connectivity.

Authors:  Binh Nguyen; Andreas Spillner; Brent C Emerson; Vincent Moulton
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2010-03-20       Impact factor: 1.405

3.  Consistency and convergence rate of phylogenetic inference via regularization.

Authors:  Vu Dinh; Lam Si Tung Ho; Marc A Suchard; Frederick A Matsen
Journal:  Ann Stat       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 4.028

4.  Rec-DCM-Eigen: reconstructing a less parsimonious but more accurate tree in shorter time.

Authors:  Seunghwa Kang; Jijun Tang; Stephen W Schaeffer; David A Bader
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Polynomial supertree methods revisited.

Authors:  Malte Brinkmeyer; Thasso Griebel; Sebastian Böcker
Journal:  Adv Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-12-21

6.  DACTAL: divide-and-conquer trees (almost) without alignments.

Authors:  Serita Nelesen; Kevin Liu; Li-San Wang; C Randal Linder; Tandy Warnow
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Using tree diversity to compare phylogenetic heuristics.

Authors:  Seung-Jin Sul; Suzanne Matthews; Tiffani L Williams
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Mega-phylogeny approach for comparative biology: an alternative to supertree and supermatrix approaches.

Authors:  Stephen A Smith; Jeremy M Beaulieu; Michael J Donoghue
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Phylogenetic search through partial tree mixing.

Authors:  Kenneth Sundberg; Mark Clement; Quinn Snell; Dan Ventura; Michael Whiting; Keith Crandall
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Simultaneous phylogeny reconstruction and multiple sequence alignment.

Authors:  Feng Yue; Jian Shi; Jijun Tang
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.