BACKGROUND: Mycophenolic acid kinetics have been reported to vary after renal transplantation, and mycophenolic acid area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) is the best predictor of suppression of graft rejection. METHODS: To determine whether mycophenolic acid kinetics vary after renal transplantation and to examine the potential role of enterohepatic recirculation, we investigated the kinetics of mycophenolic acid and mycophenolic acid glucuronide on days 2, 5, and 28 after transplantation in 10 kidney transplant recipients (male/female ratio, 1.5; mean age, 41.7 +/- 5.0 years) given 1 g mycophenolate mofetil twice a day. To facilitate therapeutic drug monitoring, we examined a limited sampling strategy for estimating 12-hour mycophenolic acid [AUC(0-12)]. RESULTS: The mean +/- SE AUC(0-12) for mycophenolic acid on day 28 was 38.5 +/- 1.6 mg x h/L, with a secondary peak 4 to 8 hours after dosing that was attributable to enterohepatic recirculation. Marked variability was shown in the kinetic profile of mycophenolic acid among patients across the three sampling days. Mycophenolic acid AUC(0-12) was positively predicted by both serum creatinine (P = .01) and serum albumin (P = .03) but not by time after transplantation, body weight, or trough concentration. Limited sampling (at 0, 1, 3, and 6 hours) accounted for 84.1% of the variability in the mycophenolic acid AUC(0-12) data and predicted the AUC(0-12) closely (r2 = 0.954) when evaluated in 10 different kidney transplant recipients. CONCLUSIONS: Mycophenolic acid AUC(0-12) is predicted by serum albumin and creatinine after kidney transplantation, and the AUC(0-12) may be determined during the early posttransplant period while the patient remains hospitalized with use of a limited sampling strategy to facilitate therapeutic drug monitoring.
BACKGROUND:Mycophenolic acid kinetics have been reported to vary after renal transplantation, and mycophenolic acid area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) is the best predictor of suppression of graft rejection. METHODS: To determine whether mycophenolic acid kinetics vary after renal transplantation and to examine the potential role of enterohepatic recirculation, we investigated the kinetics of mycophenolic acid and mycophenolic acid glucuronide on days 2, 5, and 28 after transplantation in 10 kidney transplant recipients (male/female ratio, 1.5; mean age, 41.7 +/- 5.0 years) given 1 g mycophenolate mofetil twice a day. To facilitate therapeutic drug monitoring, we examined a limited sampling strategy for estimating 12-hour mycophenolic acid [AUC(0-12)]. RESULTS: The mean +/- SE AUC(0-12) for mycophenolic acid on day 28 was 38.5 +/- 1.6 mg x h/L, with a secondary peak 4 to 8 hours after dosing that was attributable to enterohepatic recirculation. Marked variability was shown in the kinetic profile of mycophenolic acid among patients across the three sampling days. Mycophenolic acid AUC(0-12) was positively predicted by both serum creatinine (P = .01) and serum albumin (P = .03) but not by time after transplantation, body weight, or trough concentration. Limited sampling (at 0, 1, 3, and 6 hours) accounted for 84.1% of the variability in the mycophenolic acid AUC(0-12) data and predicted the AUC(0-12) closely (r2 = 0.954) when evaluated in 10 different kidney transplant recipients. CONCLUSIONS:Mycophenolic acid AUC(0-12) is predicted by serum albumin and creatinine after kidney transplantation, and the AUC(0-12) may be determined during the early posttransplant period while the patient remains hospitalized with use of a limited sampling strategy to facilitate therapeutic drug monitoring.
Authors: Christine E Staatz; Stephen B Duffull; Bryce Kiberd; Albert D Fraser; Susan E Tett Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2005-07-28 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Michel Mourad; Pierre Wallemacq; Josiane König; Evelyne Henry de Frahan; Djamila Chaib Eddour; Martine De Meyer; Jacques Malaise; Jean Paul Squifflet Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2002 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Bronwyn A Atcheson; Paul J Taylor; David W Mudge; David W Johnson; Carmel M Hawley; Scott B Campbell; Nicole M Isbel; Peter I Pillans; Susan E Tett Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Brenda C M de Winter; Teun van Gelder; Ferdi Sombogaard; Leslie M Shaw; Reinier M van Hest; Ron A A Mathot Journal: J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn Date: 2009-11-11 Impact factor: 2.745
Authors: Reinier M van Hest; Teun van Gelder; Arnold G Vulto; Leslie M Shaw; Ron A A Mathot Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2009 Impact factor: 6.447