Literature DB >> 10579092

In-vitro activity of cefepime and other broad-spectrum antimicrobials against several groups of gram-negative bacilli and Staphylococcus aureus.

E Tallis1, B Rudensky, D Attias, D Raveh, Y Schlesinger, A M Yinnon.   

Abstract

The in vitro activity of cefepime was compared with that of amikacin, ceftazidime, imipenem, ciprofloxacin, and piperacillin-tazobactam by using the E-test against five groups of carefully selected organisms: Klebsiella pneumoniae (68 isololates), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (62), methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) (60), and two groups of Enterobacteriaceae (60 and 62 isolates, respectively). The bacteria were subdivided according to whether the infection was nosocomial or community-acquired, applying accepted and predefined criteria. These isolates were obtained from patients admitted to our medical center throughout 1998. We retrospectively compared antimicrobial susceptibilities of the study sample with those of the +/- 3000 bacterial strains isolated from blood stream infections since 1990: the study sample appeared to represent adequately the clinical databank. Presence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) was determined in all groups of Enterobacteriaceae with the ESBL screening E-test strip. Of the 252 Gram-negative bacilli tested, 242 (96%) were susceptible to cefepime, whereas only 168 (67%) were susceptible to ceftazidime, 211 (84%) to amikacin, and 220 (87%) to piperacillin-tazobactam (p < 0.001). Imipenem was slightly superior to cefepime with only seven isolates resistant (3%), six of which were P. aeruginosa. Cefepime was more active against Enterobacteriaceae than ceftazidime (93% vs. 72%, p < 0.001). This superiority was most evident against nosocomial strains of K. pneumoniae, against which cefepime was > three times more active than ceftazidime. The high level of resistance seen in nosocomial isolates of K. pneumoniae is consistent with high rates of ESBL production (69%, compared with 15-26% in other Enterobacteriaceae). The MIC90 of cefepime to methicillin-sensitive S. aureus was 1.5 micrograms/mL, whereas that of ceftazidime was 4 micrograms/mL; the susceptibility rate of both was 100%. In conclusion, cefepime possesses in vitro potencies against MSSA and current clinical strains of Gram-negative bacilli, many of which harbor resistance to other antimicrobial agents. Hence, it seems very suitable for empiric coverage of serious nosocomial infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10579092     DOI: 10.1016/s0732-8893(99)00062-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0732-8893            Impact factor:   2.803


  4 in total

1.  Pharmacodynamics of cefepime alone and in combination with various antimicrobials against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro pharmacodynamic infection model.

Authors:  Vanthida Huang; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Piperacillin/tazobactam: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in moderate to severe bacterial infections.

Authors:  M Young; G L Plosker
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Adequacy of high-dose cefepime regimen in febrile neutropenic patients with hematological malignancies.

Authors:  Fekade Bruck Sime; Michael S Roberts; Ing Soo Tiong; Julia H Gardner; Sheila Lehman; Sandra L Peake; Uwe Hahn; Morgyn S Warner; Jason A Roberts
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Use of time-trend analysis in the design of empirical antimicrobial treatment of urinary tract infection.

Authors:  D Raveh; B Rudensky; M Huerta; Y Aviv; A M Yinnon
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 3.267

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.