Literature DB >> 10577929

Linkage detection adaptive to linkage disequilibrium: the disequilibrium maximum-likelihood-binomial test for affected-sibship data.

J Huang1, Y Jiang.   

Abstract

It has been demonstrated in the literature that the transmission/disequilibrium test (TDT) has higher power than the affected-sib-pair (ASP) mean test when linkage disequilibrium (LD) is strong but that the mean test has higher power when LD is weak. Thus, for ASP data, it seems clear that the TDT should be used when LD is strong but that the mean test or other linkage tests should be used when LD is weak or absent. However, in practice, it may be difficult to follow such a guideline, because the extent of LD is often unknown. Even with a highly dense genetic-marker map, in which some markers should be located near the disease-predisposing mutation, strong LD is not inevitable. Besides the genetic distance, LD is also affected by many factors, such as the allelic heterogeneity at the disease locus, the initial LD, the allelic frequencies at both disease locus and marker locus, and the age of the mutation. Therefore, it is of interest to develop methods that are adaptive to the extent of LD. In this report, we propose a disequilibrium maximum-binomial-likelihood (DMLB) test that incorporates LD in the maximum-binomial-likelihood (MLB) test. Examination of the corresponding score statistics shows that this method adaptively combines two sources of information: (a) the identity-by-descent (IBD) sharing score, which is informative for linkage regardless of the existence of LD, and (b) the contrast between allele-specific IBD sharing score, which is informative for linkage only in the presence of LD. For ASP data, the proposed test has higher power than either the TDT or the mean test when the extent of LD ranges from moderate to strong. Only when LD is very weak or absent is the DMLB slightly less powerful than the mean test; in such cases, the TDT has essentially no power to detect linkage. Therefore, the DMLB test is an interesting approach to linkage detection when the extent of LD is unknown.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10577929      PMCID: PMC1288402          DOI: 10.1086/302659

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  30 in total

1.  Robustness and power of the maximum-likelihood-binomial and maximum-likelihood-score methods, in multipoint linkage analysis of affected-sibship data.

Authors:  L Abel; B Müller-Myhsok
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Comparison of four sib-pair linkage methods for analyzing sibships with more than two affecteds: interest of the binomial maximum likelihood approach.

Authors:  L Abel; A Alcais; A Mallet
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.135

3.  The power of linkage detection by the transmission/disequilibrium tests.

Authors:  M Xiong; S W Guo
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 0.444

Review 4.  Linkage disequilibrium mapping of complex disease: fantasy or reality?

Authors:  J D Terwilliger; K M Weiss
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 9.740

5.  Genetic association mapping based on discordant sib pairs: the discordant-alleles test.

Authors:  M Boehnke; C D Langefeld
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 6.  Linkage disequilibrium measures for fine-scale mapping: a comparison.

Authors:  S W Guo
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 0.444

7.  Genomewide transmission/disequilibrium testing--consideration of the genotypic relative risks at disease loci.

Authors:  N J Camp
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Large-scale identification, mapping, and genotyping of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the human genome.

Authors:  D G Wang; J B Fan; C J Siao; A Berno; P Young; R Sapolsky; G Ghandour; N Perkins; E Winchester; J Spencer; L Kruglyak; L Stein; L Hsie; T Topaloglou; E Hubbell; E Robinson; M Mittmann; M S Morris; N Shen; D Kilburn; J Rioux; C Nusbaum; S Rozen; T J Hudson; R Lipshutz; M Chee; E S Lander
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-05-15       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  A presenilin-1 truncating mutation is present in two cases with autopsy-confirmed early-onset Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  C Tysoe; J Whittaker; J Xuereb; N J Cairns; M Cruts; C Van Broeckhoven; G Wilcock; D C Rubinsztein
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  A discordant-sibship test for disequilibrium and linkage: no need for parental data.

Authors:  S Horvath; N M Laird
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 11.025

View more
  2 in total

1.  The disequilibrium maximum-likelihood-binomial test does not replace the transmission/disequilibrium test.

Authors:  S Horvath; C Windemuth; M Knapp
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Improvement of mapping accuracy by unifying linkage and association analysis.

Authors:  Xiang-Yang Lou; Jennie Z Ma; Mark C K Yang; Jun Zhu; Peng-Yuan Liu; Hong-Wen Deng; Robert C Elston; Ming D Li
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-09-19       Impact factor: 4.562

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.