Literature DB >> 10576364

Magnetization transfer contrast imaging of liver cirrhosis.

J H Chen1, J W Chai, W C Shen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To test the feasibility of magnetization transfer contrast (MTC) imaging in the evaluation of liver cirrhosis.
METHODOLOGY: Three normal volunteers and 22 cirrhotic liver patients (13 of them harbored hepatoma) were prospectively studied with on-resonance binomial pulsed MTC imaging using a 1.0 Tesla MR scanner. Both MTC and non-MTC images were acquired. The magnetization transfer (MT) effect (defined as: 1-signal intensity of MTC/signal intensity of non-MTC), was used as an indicator and was correlated with different disease status. Lesion-to-liver contrast of non-MTC versus MTC imaging was also compared.
RESULTS: Chronic hepatitis and early fibrosis had a MT effect similar to that of the normal group. Frank cirrhosis had the strongest MT effect. Cirrhosis, when infiltrated by diffuse hepatoma, showed a significantly weaker MT effect than that of the normal group (p<0.05), early cirrhosis (P<0.005), and frank cirrhosis (p<0.05). Overall, the MT effects in these 22 patients were widely variable. There was no significant improvement in lesion contrast of MTC imaging when compared to that of non-MTC imaging due to complex signal attenuation behavior of either the background liver tissue or the tumor itself.
CONCLUSIONS: The complex pathological change of the cirrhotic liver tissue may account for the wide variation of the MT effect and the compromised lesion contrast in cirrhotic patients. Caution should be taken when cirrhotic tissue has an unusually weak MT effect. Then, the possibility of a mixed disease process such as fatty metamorphosis or diffuse hepatoma should be highly suspected. Our experience shows that MTC imaging plays a potential role in the evaluation of the multi-facets of cirrhotic tissue change.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10576364

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology        ISSN: 0172-6390


  7 in total

1.  Non-invasive detection of liver fibrosis: MR imaging features vs. MR elastography.

Authors:  Sudhakar K Venkatesh; Meng Yin; Naoki Takahashi; James F Glockner; Jayant A Talwalkar; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2015-04

2.  Assessment of hepatic fibrosis with magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Meng Yin; Jayant A Talwalkar; Kevin J Glaser; Armando Manduca; Roger C Grimm; Phillip J Rossman; Jeff L Fidler; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 11.382

3.  Initial evaluation of hepatic T1 relaxation time as an imaging marker of liver disease associated with autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease (ARPKD).

Authors:  Ying Gao; Bernadette O Erokwu; David A DeSantis; Colleen M Croniger; Rebecca M Schur; Lan Lu; Jose Mariappuram; Katherine M Dell; Chris A Flask
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 4.044

4.  Pediatric liver MR elastography.

Authors:  Suraj D Serai; Alexander J Towbin; Daniel J Podberesky
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Diagnosis and measurement of liver fibrosis by MRI in bile duct ligated rats.

Authors:  Christophe Aubé; Frédéric Moal; Frédéric Oberti; Jérôme Roux; Vincent Croquet; Yves Gallois; Christophe Argaud; Christine Caron; Paul Calès
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-04-11       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Fast macromolecular proton fraction mapping of the human liver in vivo for quantitative assessment of hepatic fibrosis.

Authors:  Vasily L Yarnykh; Erica V Tartaglione; George N Ioannou
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 7.  Recent advances in molecular magnetic resonance imaging of liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Zhiming Li; Jihong Sun; Xiaoming Yang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-03-22       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.