Literature DB >> 10576187

Vaginal birth after cesarean and uterine rupture rates in California.

K D Gregory1, L M Korst, P Cane, L D Platt, K Kahn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe attempted and successful vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) rates and uterine rupture rates for women with and without prior cesareans, and compare delivery outcomes in hospitals with different attempted VBAC rates.
METHODS: We used California hospital discharge summary data for 1995 to calculate attempted and successful VBAC rates and uterine rupture rates. We used multivariate logistic regression models to evaluate and adjust for age, ethnicity, and payment source. We report the relative risk (RR), attributable fraction, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for uterine rupture.
RESULTS: There were 536,785 delivery discharges during 1995. The cesarean rate was 20.8%, and 12.5% of women had histories of cesareans. Of women with histories of cesareans, 61.4% attempted VBAC and 34.8% were successful. There were 392 uterine ruptures (0.07%). Women with prior cesareans were 16.98 (95% CI 13.51, 21.43) times more likely to experience uterine rupture, attributable fraction 66% (95% CI 60%, 73%). Among women with prior cesareans, those who attempted VBAC were 1.88 (95% CI 1.45, 2.44) times as likely to have uterine rupture, attributable fraction 34% (95% CI 21%, 46%). Women who delivered in hospitals with high attempted VBAC rates were less likely to have cesarean deliveries, more likely to have successful VBACs, and more likely to experience uterine ruptures.
CONCLUSION: Uterine rupture occurs at a low rate in women with and without prior cesarean delivery. Risk of rupture is increased among women with prior cesarean delivery and among those who attempt VBAC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10576187     DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00422-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  4 in total

1.  Explaining source of payment differences in U.S. cesarean rates: why do privately insured mothers receive more cesareans than mothers who are not privately insured?

Authors:  Darren Grant
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2005-02

2.  Injection of MTX for the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: comparison between different methods.

Authors:  Xiang-Hua Yin; Shi-Zhang Yang; Zhong-Qin Wang; Hong-Yan Jia; Min Shi
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-07-15

3.  Factors predisposing to perinatal death related to uterine rupture during attempted vaginal birth after caesarean section: retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Gordon C S Smith; Jill P Pell; Dharmintra Pasupathy; Richard Dobbie
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-07-19

Review 4.  An approach to identify a minimum and rational proportion of caesarean sections in resource-poor settings: a global network study.

Authors:  José M Belizán; Nicole Minckas; Elizabeth M McClure; Sarah Saleem; Janet L Moore; Shivaprasad S Goudar; Fabian Esamai; Archana Patel; Elwyn Chomba; Ana L Garces; Fernando Althabe; Margo S Harrison; Nancy F Krebs; Richard J Derman; Waldemar A Carlo; Edward A Liechty; Patricia L Hibberd; Pierre M Buekens; Robert L Goldenberg
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 26.763

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.