F J Schmitz1, A C Fluit, S Brisse, J Verhoef, K Köhrer, D Milatovic. 1. Institute for Medical Microbiology and Virology, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Universitätsstrasse 1, Geb. 22.21, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany. schmidtfj@uni-duesseldorf.de
Abstract
UNLABELLED: New fluoroquinolones (FQ) may possibly be used as alternative therapeutic options for Staphylococcus aureus infections. Our objectives were: (1) to define the in vitro activities of seven FQs in a collection of 434 methicillin-susceptible and 457 methicillin-resistant S. aureus from 23 European university hospitals; (2) to characterise the prevalence of mutations in the grlA and gyrA genes in all ciprofloxacin-resistant (n=433) isolates of S. aureus; (3) to determine the percentage of ciprofloxacin-resistant S. aureus strains with measurable quinolone efflux. METHODS: (1) The in vitro activities of different FQs were determined by microdilution tests. (2) PCR-amplified DNA was sequenced. (3) Ciprofloxacin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were determined in the presence and absence of reserpine, which inhibits efflux pumps. RESULTS: (1) Irrespective of the methicillin resistance of the isolates, sitafloxacin and clinafloxacin showed the best in vitro activities. (2) All ciprofloxacin-resistant isolates exhibited GrlA alterations, namely Ser-80-->Phe or Tyr or Glu-84-->Lys or Ala-116-->Glu or Pro or a combination of Ser-80-->Phe and Glu-84-->Val. These alterations in GrlA were combined with alterations in GyrA, namely Ser-84-->Leu or Lys or Glu-88-->Lys or Val. (3) Reserpine reduced ciprofloxacin MIC values in ca. 30% of the clinical isolates tested. CONCLUSIONS: (1) This current European overview of mutations involved in FQ resistance demonstrates that only a limited number of classical mutations in grlA and gyrA contributed to resistance in clinical isolates. (2) An efflux pump is involved in ca. 30% of ciprofloxacin-resistant S. aureus isolates. (3) Sitafloxacin and clinafloxacin are two very promising new FQs with good anti-staphylococcal activity. New FQs, perhaps in combination with efflux pump inhibitors, might play a role in the treatment of S. aureus infections.
UNLABELLED: New fluoroquinolones (FQ) may possibly be used as alternative therapeutic options for Staphylococcus aureus infections. Our objectives were: (1) to define the in vitro activities of seven FQs in a collection of 434 methicillin-susceptible and 457 methicillin-resistant S. aureus from 23 European university hospitals; (2) to characterise the prevalence of mutations in the grlA and gyrA genes in all ciprofloxacin-resistant (n=433) isolates of S. aureus; (3) to determine the percentage of ciprofloxacin-resistant S. aureus strains with measurable quinolone efflux. METHODS: (1) The in vitro activities of different FQs were determined by microdilution tests. (2) PCR-amplified DNA was sequenced. (3) Ciprofloxacin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were determined in the presence and absence of reserpine, which inhibits efflux pumps. RESULTS: (1) Irrespective of the methicillin resistance of the isolates, sitafloxacin and clinafloxacin showed the best in vitro activities. (2) All ciprofloxacin-resistant isolates exhibited GrlA alterations, namely Ser-80-->Phe or Tyr or Glu-84-->Lys or Ala-116-->Glu or Pro or a combination of Ser-80-->Phe and Glu-84-->Val. These alterations in GrlA were combined with alterations in GyrA, namely Ser-84-->Leu or Lys or Glu-88-->Lys or Val. (3) Reserpine reduced ciprofloxacin MIC values in ca. 30% of the clinical isolates tested. CONCLUSIONS: (1) This current European overview of mutations involved in FQ resistance demonstrates that only a limited number of classical mutations in grlA and gyrA contributed to resistance in clinical isolates. (2) An efflux pump is involved in ca. 30% of ciprofloxacin-resistant S. aureus isolates. (3) Sitafloxacin and clinafloxacin are two very promising new FQs with good anti-staphylococcal activity. New FQs, perhaps in combination with efflux pump inhibitors, might play a role in the treatment of S. aureus infections.
Authors: M Boos; S Mayer; A Fischer; K Köhrer; S Scheuring; P Heisig; J Verhoef; A C Fluit; F J Schmitz Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: C Hal Jones; Margareta Tuckman; Anita Y M Howe; Mark Orlowski; Stanley Mullen; Karen Chan; Patricia A Bradford Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Pascal Lapierre; Ann Huletsky; Véronique Fortin; François J Picard; Paul H Roy; Marc Ouellette; Michel G Bergeron Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Luke Lin; Li-Wen Chang; Cheng-Yuan Tsai; Ching-Hung Hsu; David T Chung; William S Aronstein; Funmi Ajayi; Barbara Kuzmak; Robert A Lyon Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2009-11-02 Impact factor: 5.191