Literature DB >> 10573025

Surgical sperm recovery for intracytoplasmic sperm injection: which method is to be preferred?

H Tournaye1.   

Abstract

Different methods for recovering epididymal or testicular spermatozoa have been described and each has its drawbacks and advantages. Percutaneous aspiration of the testis may be the method of choice in cases of irreparable obstructive azoospermia. Using a 21-gauge needle, spermatozoa may be recovered in 96 % of patients. More patients undergoing fine-needle aspiration experienced less pain than expected as compared with those undergoing open biopsy. Microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration (MESA) is the preferred method in patients with an incomplete work-up because, if indicated, a vasoepididymostomy can be performed concomitantly with a full scrotal exploration. In azoospermic patients with testicular failure, the sperm recovery rate, i.e. the chance of finding at least one spermatozoon, is around 50% after multiple open biopsies. However, the fertilization rates after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) are significantly lower than in men with normal spermatogenesis, and complete fertilization failure may occur more frequently. Although the combination of testicular sperm extraction (TESE) and ICSI may be the sole treatment available for infertility because of non-obstructive azoospermia, the overall success rate is limited and ongoing pregnancies are obtained in < or =20% of ICSI cycles. In patients with incomplete Sertoli cell-only syndrome, testicular damage may be limited by use of a selective microsurgical approach; less invasive methods such as fine-needle aspiration are not useful in these patients. Of 14 patients with primary testicular failure as proven by histopathology, only in one case (7.1%) were spermatozoa recovered by multiple aspirations, while in nine cases (64.3%) spermatozoa were recovered by open biopsy. Although the pregnancy rates reported after ICSI with frozen-thawed testicular spermatozoa from patients with primary testicular failure are relatively low, the recovery of testicular spermatozoa by open biopsy followed by cryopreservation may be the method of choice by which to prevent repeat surgery and pointless ovarian stimulation in the female partner.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10573025     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/14.suppl_1.71

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  16 in total

1.  The difficult MESA: findings from tubuli recti sperm aspiration.

Authors:  Ulrike Zenke; Liza Jalalian; Shehua Shen; Paul J Turek
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Surgical recovery of sperm in non-obstructive azoospermia.

Authors:  Tomomoto Ishikawa
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 3.  Management of non-obstructive azoospermia.

Authors:  Koji Chiba; Noritoshi Enatsu; Masato Fujisawa
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2016-01-18

Review 4.  Current status of vasectomy reversal.

Authors:  J Ullrich Schwarzer; Heiko Steinfatt
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 5.  Diagnostic and therapeutic testis biopsy.

Authors:  P T Chan; P N Schlegel
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.862

6.  In vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection for male infertility.

Authors:  Rubina Merchant; Goral Gandhi; Gautam N Allahbadia
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2011-01

7.  Testicular fine-needle aspiration versus testicular open biopsy: Comparable sperm retrieval rate in selected patients.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Nowroozi; Hamed Ahmadi; Mohsen Ayati; Hasan Jamshidian; Ali Sirous
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2012-01

Review 8.  An update on sperm retrieval techniques for azoospermic males.

Authors:  Sandro C Esteves; Ricardo Miyaoka; José Eduardo Orosz; Ashok Agarwal
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 9.  The epidemiology and etiology of azoospermia.

Authors:  Marcello Cocuzza; Conrado Alvarenga; Rodrigo Pagani
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.365

10.  Micro-dissection testicular sperm extraction as an alternative for sperm acquisition in the most difficult cases of Azoospermia: Technique and preliminary results in India.

Authors:  Mohamed C Ashraf; Sankalp Singh; Dharma Raj; Sujatha Ramakrishnan; Sandro C Esteves
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2013-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.