Literature DB >> 10572386

Does the functional assessment measure (FAM) extend the functional independence measure (FIM) instrument? A rasch analysis of stroke inpatients.

R T Linn1, R S Blair, C V Granger, D W Harper, P A O'Hara, E Maciura.   

Abstract

Adding the items of the Functional Assessment Measure (FAM) to the Functional Independence Measure (FIM instrument) has been proposed as a method to extend the range of the FIM, particularly when assessing functional status in rehabilitation patients with brain injury, including stroke. It has been proposed that this approach is especially helpful in ameliorating ceiling effects when brain-injured patients have reached the end of their inpatient rehabilitation stay or are being seen in outpatient settings. In the present study, 376 consecutive stroke patients on a Canadian inpatient rehabilitation unit were concurrently administered the FIM and the FAM. Rasch analysis was used to evaluate how well the FAM items extended the difficulty range of the FIM for both the Motor and Cognitive domains. Within the Motor domain, only the FAM item assessing Community Access was found to be more difficult than extant FIM items, and this item showed some tendency to misfit with the other motor items. In the Cognitive domain, the only FAM item with a higher difficulty level than the FIM items was that assessing Employability. Notably, strict adherence to scoring guidelines for these two FAM items requires taking patients out into the community to evaluate their actual performances, a practice unlikely in the typical inpatient stroke rehabilitation unit. Results indicate that use of the entire FAM as an adjunct to the FIM reduces test efficiency while providing only minimal additional protection against ceiling effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10572386

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Outcome Meas        ISSN: 1090-655X


  4 in total

1.  Construction and validation of a fatigue impact scale for daily administration (D-FIS).

Authors:  John D Fisk; Susan E Doble
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  The Responsiveness of the Lucerne ICF-Based Multidisciplinary Observation Scale: A Comparison with the Functional Independence Measure and the Barthel Index.

Authors:  Tim Vanbellingen; Beatrice Ottiger; Tobias Pflugshaupt; Jan Mehrholz; Stephan Bohlhalter; Tobias Nef; Thomas Nyffeler
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 4.003

3.  A comprehensive psychometric evaluation of the UK FIM + FAM.

Authors:  Lynne Turner-Stokes; Richard J Siegert
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 3.033

4.  The UK Functional Assessment Measure (UK FIM+FAM): Psychometric Evaluation in Patients Undergoing Specialist Rehabilitation following a Stroke from the National UK Clinical Dataset.

Authors:  Meenakshi Nayar; Roxana Vanderstay; Richard J Siegert; Lynne Turner-Stokes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.