Literature DB >> 10571972

Long-term outcome of patients with intermediate-risk exercise electrocardiograms who do not have myocardial perfusion defects on radionuclide imaging.

R J Gibbons1, D O Hodge, D S Berman, O O Akinboboye, J Heo, R Hachamovitch, K R Bailey, A E Iskandrian.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The appropriate management of patients with intermediate-risk Duke treadmill scores is not established. The purpose of this study was to determine the long-term risk of subsequent cardiovascular events in patients with an intermediate-risk treadmill score who do not have myocardial perfusion defects on radionuclide imaging. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The existing databases of the nuclear cardiology laboratories of 4 academic institutions were searched retrospectively. A total of 4649 patients were identified who had intermediate-risk Duke treadmill scores (-10 to 4), normal or near-normal exercise single photon-emission computed tomographic myocardial perfusion images using either thallium-201 or technetium-99m sestamibi, and no previous coronary revascularization. Follow-up was 95% complete. Cardiovascular survival was 99.8% at 1 year, 99.0% at 5 years, and 98.5% at 7 years. Cardiac survival free of myocardial infarction was similarly high at 96.6% at 7 years. Cardiac survival free of myocardial infarction or revascularization was 87.1% at 7 years. Near-normal scans and cardiac enlargement were independent predictors of time to cardiac death. Seven-year cardiac survival was still high at 97.0% in the 357 patients with near-normal scans and normal cardiac size and somewhat lower, at 89.0%, in the 167 patients with cardiac enlargement.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with an intermediate-risk treadmill score but with normal or near-normal exercise myocardial perfusion images and normal cardiac sizes are at low risk for subsequent cardiac death and can be safely managed medically until their symptoms warrant revascularization. The appropriate management of patients with cardiac enlargement will remain a matter of clinical judgment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10571972     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.100.21.2140

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  45 in total

Review 1.  Myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  R J Gibbons
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Is a revision of the "nuclear cardiology warranty" in order?

Authors:  Gregory S Thomas; Michael I Miyamoto
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Risk stratification of the normal perfusion scan: does normal stress perfusion always mean very low risk?

Authors:  Seth Dahlberg; Jeffrey Leppo
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Effects of therapy with beta-blocker agents on myocardial perfusion and outcome.

Authors:  Deval Mehta; Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 5.  Assessment of prognosis in chronic coronary artery disease.

Authors:  T M Bateman; E Prvulovich
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 6.  Prognostic value of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT.

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  The vasodilator stress ECG: should depression cause anxiety?

Authors:  Brian G Abbott
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 8.  Assessing clinical impact of myocardial perfusion studies: ischemia or other prognostic indicators?

Authors:  Todd D Miller; John Wells Askew; Joerg Herrmann
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in morbidly obese patients: image quality, hemodynamic response to pharmacologic stress, and diagnostic and prognostic value.

Authors:  W Lane Duvall; Lori B Croft; Jared S Corriel; Andrew J Einstein; Jonathan E Fisher; Pilar S Haynes; Randi K Rose; Milena J Henzlova
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 10.  Role of myocardial perfusion imaging for risk stratification in suspected or known coronary artery disease.

Authors:  N K Sabharwal; A Lahiri
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.994

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.