Literature DB >> 10571703

Effects of information framing on the intentions of family physicians to prescribe long-term hormone replacement therapy.

J Nikolajevic-Sarunac1, D A Henry, D L O'Connell, J Robertson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the way in which information on benefits and harms of long-term hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is presented influences family physicians' intentions to prescribe this treatment.
DESIGN: Family physicians were randomized to receive information on treatment outcomes expressed in relative terms, or as the number needing to be treated (NNT) with HRT to prevent or cause an event. A control group received no information.
SETTING: Primary care. PARTICIPANTS: Family physicians practicing in the Hunter Valley, New South Wales, Australia. INTERVENTION: Estimates of the impact of long-term HRT on risk of coronary events, hip fractures, and breast cancer were summarized as relative (proportional) decreases or increases in risk, or as NNT.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Intention to prescribe HRT for seven hypothetical patients was measured on Likert scales. Of 389 family physicians working in the Hunter Valley, 243 completed the baseline survey and 215 participated in the randomized trial. Baseline intention to prescribe varied across patients-it was highest in the presence of risk factors for hip fracture, but coexisting risk factors for breast cancer had a strong negative influence. Overall, a larger proportion of subjects receiving information expressed as NNT had reduced intentions, and a smaller proportion had increased intentions to prescribe HRT than those receiving the information expressed in relative terms, or the control group. However, the differences were small and only reached statistical significance for three hypothetical patients. Framing effects were minimal when the hypothetical patient had coexisting risk factors for breast cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: Information framing had some effect on family physicians' intentions to prescribe HRT, but the effects were smaller than those previously reported, and they were modified by the presence of serious potential adverse treatment effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10571703      PMCID: PMC1496748          DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.09028.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  19 in total

Review 1.  The effects of information framing on the practices of physicians.

Authors:  P McGettigan; K Sly; D O'Connell; S Hill; D Henry
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Menopausal hormone replacement therapy and breast cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Sillero-Arenas; M Delgado-Rodriguez; R Rodigues-Canteras; A Bueno-Cavanillas; R Galvez-Vargas
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Absolutely relative: how research results are summarized can affect treatment decisions.

Authors:  L Forrow; W C Taylor; R M Arnold
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  Estrogen replacement therapy and coronary heart disease: a quantitative assessment of the epidemiologic evidence.

Authors:  M J Stampfer; G A Colditz
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  A meta-analysis of the effect of estrogen replacement therapy on the risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  K K Steinberg; S B Thacker; S J Smith; D F Stroup; M M Zack; W D Flanders; R L Berkelman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-04-17       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Treating hypercholesterolemia. How should practicing physicians interpret the published data for patients?

Authors:  A S Brett
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-09-07       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Breast cancer and hormone replacement therapy: collaborative reanalysis of data from 51 epidemiological studies of 52,705 women with breast cancer and 108,411 women without breast cancer. Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-10-11       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  The framing effect of relative and absolute risk.

Authors:  D J Malenka; J A Baron; S Johansen; J W Wahrenberger; J M Ross
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Menopausal estrogen replacement therapy and breast cancer.

Authors:  W D Dupont; D L Page
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1991-01

10.  Measured enthusiasm: does the method of reporting trial results alter perceptions of therapeutic effectiveness?

Authors:  C D Naylor; E Chen; B Strauss
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1992-12-01       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  The effects of information framing on the practices of physicians.

Authors:  P McGettigan; K Sly; D O'Connell; S Hill; D Henry
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Physician and patient factors associated with ordering a colon evaluation after a positive fecal occult blood test.

Authors:  Barbara Turner; Ronald E Myers; Terry Hyslop; Walter W Hauck; David Weinberg; Timothy Brigham; James Grana; Todd Rothermel; Neil Schlackman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  A randomized comparison of patients' understanding of number needed to treat and other common risk reduction formats.

Authors:  Stacey L Sheridan; Michael P Pignone; Carmen L Lewis
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Identifying patient preferences for communicating risk estimates: a descriptive pilot study.

Authors:  J M Fortin; L K Hirota; B E Bond; A M O'Connor; N F Col
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2001-08-01       Impact factor: 2.796

5.  Family physicians' perceptions of academic detailing: a quantitative and qualitative study.

Authors:  Michael Allen; Suzanne Ferrier; Nicolette O'Connor; Isobel Fleming
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2007-10-12       Impact factor: 2.463

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.