Literature DB >> 10571671

Divided we stand: tracking cell proliferation with carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester.

A B Lyons1.   

Abstract

Most techniques for assessing cell division can either detect limited numbers of cell divisions (bromodeoxyuridine incorporation) or only quantify overall proliferation (tritiated thymidine incorporation). In the majority of cases, viable cells of known division history cannot subsequently be obtained for functional studies. The cells of the immune system undergo marked proliferation and differentiation during the course of an immune response. The relative lack of an organized structure of the lymphohaemopoietic system, in contrast with other organ systems, makes lineage interrelationships difficult to study. Coupled with the remarkable degree of mobility engendered by recirculation, the differentiation occurring along with cell division in the immune system has not been readily accessible for investigation. The present article reviews the development of a cell division analysis procedure based on the quantitative serial halving of the membrane permeant, stably incorporating fluorescent dye carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFSE or CFDA, SE). The technique can be used both in vitro and in vivo, allowing eight to 10 successive divisions to be resolved by flow cytometry. Furthermore, viable cells from defined generation numbers can be sorted by flow cytometry for functional analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10571671     DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1711.1999.00864.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Immunol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0818-9641            Impact factor:   5.126


  40 in total

Review 1.  Recent developments in flow cytometry.

Authors:  A Scheffold; F Kern
Journal:  J Clin Immunol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 8.317

2.  The heat shock-induced cell cycle arrest is attenuated by weak electromagnetic fields.

Authors:  Sergey V Tokalov; Herwig O Gutzeit
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 6.831

3.  Label Structured Cell Proliferation Models.

Authors:  H T Banks; Frédérique Charles; Marie Doumic Jauffret; Karyn L Sutton; W Clayton Thompson
Journal:  Appl Math Lett       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 4.055

4.  Oxidant generation by single infected monocytes after short-term fluorescence labeling of a protozoan parasite.

Authors:  Haeok K Chang; Colin Thalhofer; Breck A Duerkop; Joanna S Mehling; Shilpi Verma; Kenneth J Gollob; Roque Almeida; Mary E Wilson
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 5.  Analysis of cell cycle phases and progression in cultured mammalian cells.

Authors:  Christoph Schorl; John M Sedivy
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.608

6.  Varying responses of human cells with discrepant p53 activity to ionizing radiation and heat shock exposure.

Authors:  S V Tokalov; S Pieck; H O Gutzeit
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.831

7.  Monitoring growth phase-related changes in phosphatidylcholine-specific phospholipase C production, adhesion properties and physiology of Bacillus cereus vegetative cells.

Authors:  Ultan P Cronin; Martin G Wilkinson
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2008-08-23       Impact factor: 3.346

8.  In situ activation of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells in the presence of antigen in organotypic brain slices.

Authors:  Changying Ling; Yakov I Verbny; Matthew I Banks; Matyas Sandor; Zsuzsanna Fabry
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2008-06-15       Impact factor: 5.422

9.  Determination of in situ bacterial growth rates in aquifers and aquifer sediments.

Authors:  Brian J Mailloux; Mark E Fuller
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Simultaneous analysis of p53 protein expression and cell proliferation in irradiated human lymphocytes by flow cytometry.

Authors:  Rafael de Freitas E Silva; Neyliane Frassinetti Gonçalves Dos Santos; Valéria Rěgo Alves Pereira; Ademir Amaral
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 2.658

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.