Literature DB >> 10571472

Blocking can occur without losses in attention in rats with selective removal of hippocampal cholinergic input.

M G Baxter1, M Gallagher, P C Holland.   

Abstract

Prior studies showed that 192 IgG-saporin lesions of cholinergic input to the hippocampus disrupted reductions in processing of uninformative stimuli. In 2 experiments in this study, the performance of rats with these lesions was examined in blocking procedures. In both lesioned and normal rats, previous pairing of one conditioned stimulus (CS) with food blocked conditioning of a 2nd CS when a compound of both CSs was paired with food. However, in subsequent savings tests, lesioned rats showed faster learning than did normal rats when the blocked CS was established as a signal for either reinforcement or nonreinforcement. Thus, the reduced attention to the blocked CS found in normal but not lesioned rats was not essential for the occurrence of blocking. Although rats with selective removal of hippocampal cholinergic input may be unable to reduce attention to redundant stimuli, other mechanisms of stimulus selection remain available to them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10571472     DOI: 10.1037//0735-7044.113.5.881

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 0735-7044            Impact factor:   1.912


  8 in total

1.  Selective hippocampal lesions disrupt a novel cue effect but fail to eliminate blocking in rabbit eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  M Todd Allen; Yahaira Padilla; Catherine E Myers; Mark A Gluck
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Variations in unconditioned stimulus processing in unblocking.

Authors:  Peter C Holland; Cynthia Kenmuir
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2005-04

3.  Blocking in rabbit eyeblink conditioning is not due to learned inattention: indirect support for an error correction mechanism of blocking.

Authors:  M Todd Allen; Yahaira Padilla; Mark A Gluck
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  2002 Oct-Dec

4.  Daily Exposure to Sucrose Impairs Subsequent Learning About Food Cues: A Role for Alterations in Ghrelin Signaling and Dopamine D2 Receptors.

Authors:  M J Sharpe; K J Clemens; M J Morris; R F Westbrook
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 5.  Mini-review: Prediction errors, attention and associative learning.

Authors:  Peter C Holland; Felipe L Schiffino
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 2.877

Review 6.  Septohippocampal acetylcholine: involved in but not necessary for learning and memory?

Authors:  Marise B Parent; Mark G Baxter
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.460

7.  Modeling attention in associative learning: two processes or one?

Authors:  M E Le Pelley; Mark Haselgrove; Guillem R Esber
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 8.  Interaction of basal forebrain cholinergic neurons with the glucocorticoid system in stress regulation and cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Saswati Paul; Won Kyung Jeon; Jennifer L Bizon; Jung-Soo Han
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 5.750

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.