OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the routine use of supplementary intracameral lidocaine has any benefit over topical anesthesia alone when performing phacoemulsification surgery. DESIGN: A prospective single-center, randomized, double-masked, clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 204 patients undergoing phacoemulsification surgery with lens implantation under planned topical anesthesia. METHODS: Patients were randomly allocated to receive either topical anesthesia plus 0.5 ml intracameral balanced salt solution or topical anesthesia plus 0.5 ml preservative-free 1% intracameral lidocaine. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: On the day after surgery, patients were asked to document the discomfort they had experienced using a visual analog scale. Intraoperative discomfort, postoperative discomfort, and discomfort caused by the microscope light were assessed. RESULTS: Multiple linear regression analysis did not show any significant relationship between the use of intracameral lidocaine and either intraoperative (P = 0.34) or postoperative (P = 0.45) pain scores. There was a small reduction in the discomfort caused by the operating microscope when intracameral lidocaine was used (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the routine use of intracameral lidocaine as a supplement to topical anesthesia was shown not to have a clinically useful role.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the routine use of supplementary intracameral lidocaine has any benefit over topical anesthesia alone when performing phacoemulsification surgery. DESIGN: A prospective single-center, randomized, double-masked, clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 204 patients undergoing phacoemulsification surgery with lens implantation under planned topical anesthesia. METHODS:Patients were randomly allocated to receive either topical anesthesia plus 0.5 ml intracameral balanced salt solution or topical anesthesia plus 0.5 ml preservative-free 1% intracameral lidocaine. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: On the day after surgery, patients were asked to document the discomfort they had experienced using a visual analog scale. Intraoperative discomfort, postoperative discomfort, and discomfort caused by the microscope light were assessed. RESULTS: Multiple linear regression analysis did not show any significant relationship between the use of intracameral lidocaine and either intraoperative (P = 0.34) or postoperative (P = 0.45) pain scores. There was a small reduction in the discomfort caused by the operating microscope when intracameral lidocaine was used (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the routine use of intracameral lidocaine as a supplement to topical anesthesia was shown not to have a clinically useful role.
Authors: Alvin K H Kwok; Timothy Y Y Lai; Vincent Y W Lee; Yat-Shan Yeung; Kai-On Chu; Calvin C P Pang Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2006-02-17 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: A S Ioannidis; K Papageorgiou; K I Alexandraki; P Massaoutis; A J Sinha; P S Andreou Journal: Int Ophthalmol Date: 2010-01-28 Impact factor: 2.031