Literature DB >> 10570162

Possible ecological risks of transgenic organism release when transgenes affect mating success: sexual selection and the Trojan gene hypothesis.

W M Muir1, R D Howard.   

Abstract

Widespread interest in producing transgenic organisms is balanced by concern over ecological hazards, such as species extinction if such organisms were to be released into nature. An ecological risk associated with the introduction of a transgenic organism is that the transgene, though rare, can spread in a natural population. An increase in transgene frequency is often assumed to be unlikely because transgenic organisms typically have some viability disadvantage. Reduced viability is assumed to be common because transgenic individuals are best viewed as macromutants that lack any history of selection that could reduce negative fitness effects. However, these arguments ignore the potential advantageous effects of transgenes on some aspect of fitness such as mating success. Here, we examine the risk to a natural population after release of a few transgenic individuals when the transgene trait simultaneously increases transgenic male mating success and lowers the viability of transgenic offspring. We obtained relevant life history data by using the small cyprinodont fish, Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes) as a model. Our deterministic equations predict that a transgene introduced into a natural population by a small number of transgenic fish will spread as a result of enhanced mating advantage, but the reduced viability of offspring will cause eventual local extinction of both populations. Such risks should be evaluated with each new transgenic animal before release.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10570162      PMCID: PMC24154          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.96.24.13853

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  4 in total

1.  Growth enhancement in transgenic Atlantic salmon by the use of an "all fish" chimeric growth hormone gene construct.

Authors:  S J Du; Z Y Gong; G L Fletcher; M A Shears; M J King; D R Idler; C L Hew
Journal:  Biotechnology (N Y)       Date:  1992-02

2.  Competition and body size.

Authors:  J M Smith; R L Brown
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 1.570

Review 3.  Models of genetically engineered organisms and their ecological impact.

Authors:  P J Regal
Journal:  Recomb DNA Tech Bull       Date:  1987-09

4.  Mate choice and mate competition influence male body size in Japanese medaka.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.844

  4 in total
  25 in total

1.  Effects of transgenic sterilization constructs and their repressor compounds on hatch, developmental rate and early survival of electroporated channel catfish embryos and fry.

Authors:  Baofeng Su; Mei Shang; Chao Li; Dayan A Perera; Carl A Pinkert; Michael H Irwin; Eric Peatman; Peter Grewe; Jawahar G Patil; Rex A Dunham
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 2.788

2.  Genetic engineering: what are we fearing?

Authors:  Perry B Hackett
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 3.  Assessment of possible ecological risks and hazards of transgenic fish with implications for other sexually reproducing organisms.

Authors:  William M Muir; Richard D Howard
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 4.  Fish can be first--advances in fish transgenesis for commercial applications.

Authors:  Halina M Zbikowska
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.788

5.  The threats and benefits of GM fish.

Authors:  William M Muir
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 8.807

6.  Transgenic male mating advantage provides opportunity for Trojan gene effect in a fish.

Authors:  Richard D Howard; J Andrew DeWoody; William M Muir
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-02-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Fishing for answers with transposons.

Authors:  Shannon A Wadman; Karl J Clark; Perry B Hackett
Journal:  Mar Biotechnol (NY)       Date:  2005-05-05       Impact factor: 3.619

8.  Is political correctness damaging science? Peer pressure and mainstream thinking may discourage novelty and innovation.

Authors:  Philip Hunter
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 8.807

9.  Standing genetic variation and compensatory evolution in transgenic organisms: a growth-enhanced salmon simulation.

Authors:  Robert N M Ahrens; Robert H Devlin
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 2.788

10.  Transgenic salmon: a final leap to the grocery shelf?

Authors:  Alison L Van Eenennaam; William M Muir
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 54.908

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.