Literature DB >> 10567571

Conservation of histone binding and transcriptional repressor functions in a Schizosaccharomyces pombe Tup1p homolog.

Y Mukai1, E Matsuo, S Y Roth, S Harashima.   

Abstract

The Ssn6p-Tup1p corepressor complex is important to the regulation of several diverse genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and serves as a model for corepressor functions. To investigate the evolutionary conservation of these functions, sequences homologous to the S. cerevisiae TUP1 gene were cloned from Kluyveromyces lactis (TUP1) and Schizosaccharomyces pombe (tup11(+)). Interestingly, while the K. lactis TUP1 gene complemented an S. cerevisiae tup1 null mutation, the S. pombe tup11(+) gene did not, even when expressed under the control of the S. cerevisiae TUP1 promoter. However, an S. pombe Tup11p-LexA fusion protein repressed transcription of a corresponding reporter gene, indicating that this Tup1p homolog has intrinsic repressor activity. Moreover, a chimeric protein containing the amino-terminal Ssn6p-binding domain of S. cerevisiae Tup1p and 544 amino acids from the C-terminal region of S. pombe Tup11p complemented the S. cerevisiae tup1 mutation. The failure of native S. pombe Tup11p to complement loss of Tup1p functions in S. cerevisiae corresponds to an inability to bind to S. cerevisiae Ssn6p in vitro. Disruption of tup11(+) in combination with a disruption of tup12(+), another TUP1 homolog gene in S. pombe, causes a defect in glucose repression of fbp1(+), suggesting that S. pombe Tup1p homologs function as repressors in S. pombe. Furthermore, Tup11p binds specifically to histones H3 and H4 in vitro, indicating that both the repression and histone binding functions of Tup1p-related proteins are conserved across species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10567571      PMCID: PMC84951          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.19.12.8461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  37 in total

Review 1.  Regulation of gene expression by oxygen in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  R S Zitomer; C V Lowry
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1992-03

2.  Isolation and characterization of acid phosphatase mutants in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  A To-E; Y Ueda; S I Kakimoto; Y Oshima
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1973-02       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Crystal structure of a G-protein beta gamma dimer at 2.1A resolution.

Authors:  J Sondek; A Bohm; D G Lambright; H E Hamm; P B Sigler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-01-25       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Functional dissection of the yeast Cyc8-Tup1 transcriptional co-repressor complex.

Authors:  D Tzamarias; K Struhl
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-06-30       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Involvement of the SIN4 global transcriptional regulator in the chromatin structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Y W Jiang; D J Stillman
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  RPD1 (SIN3/UME4) is required for maximal activation and repression of diverse yeast genes.

Authors:  M Vidal; R Strich; R E Esposito; R F Gaber
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  RPD3 encodes a second factor required to achieve maximum positive and negative transcriptional states in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  M Vidal; R F Gaber
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Ssn6-Tup1 is a general repressor of transcription in yeast.

Authors:  C A Keleher; M J Redd; J Schultz; M Carlson; A D Johnson
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1992-02-21       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  The Rox1 repressor of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae hypoxic genes is a specific DNA-binding protein with a high-mobility-group motif.

Authors:  B Balasubramanian; C V Lowry; R S Zitomer
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  TSF3, a global regulatory protein that silences transcription of yeast GAL genes, also mediates repression by alpha 2 repressor and is identical to SIN4.

Authors:  S Chen; R W West; S L Johnson; H Gans; B Kruger; J Ma
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.272

View more
  20 in total

1.  Histone acetylation at promoters is differentially affected by specific activators and repressors.

Authors:  J Deckert; K Struhl
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Ssn6-Tup1 interacts with class I histone deacetylases required for repression.

Authors:  A D Watson; D G Edmondson; J R Bone; Y Mukai; Y Yu; W Du; D J Stillman; S Y Roth
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Protein kinase A and mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways antagonistically regulate fission yeast fbp1 transcription by employing different modes of action at two upstream activation sites.

Authors:  L A Neely; C S Hoffman
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Crystal structure of the N-terminal domain of the yeast general corepressor Tup1p and its functional implications.

Authors:  Hiroyoshi Matsumura; Nanoha Kusaka; Taichi Nakamura; Naoko Tanaka; Keita Sagegami; Koichi Uegaki; Tsuyoshi Inoue; Yukio Mukai
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Reciprocal nuclear shuttling of two antagonizing Zn finger proteins modulates Tup family corepressor function to repress chromatin remodeling.

Authors:  Kouji Hirota; Charles S Hoffman; Kunihiro Ohta
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2006-10-06

6.  Transcriptional regulators of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe fbp1 gene include two redundant Tup1p-like corepressors and the CCAAT binding factor activation complex.

Authors:  R T Janoo; L A Neely; B R Braun; S K Whitehall; C S Hoffman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  A core SMRT corepressor complex containing HDAC3 and TBL1, a WD40-repeat protein linked to deafness.

Authors:  M G Guenther; W S Lane; W Fischle; E Verdin; M A Lazar; R Shiekhattar
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  Role of fission yeast Tup1-like repressors and Prr1 transcription factor in response to salt stress.

Authors:  Amanda Greenall; Andrew P Hadcroft; Panagiota Malakasi; Nic Jones; Brian A Morgan; Charles S Hoffman; Simon K Whitehall
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.138

9.  The LAMMER kinase homolog, Lkh1, regulates Tup transcriptional repressors through phosphorylation in Schizosaccharomyces pombe.

Authors:  Won-Hwa Kang; Yun-Hee Park; Hee-Moon Park
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  WD40 domain divergence is important for functional differences between the fission yeast Tup11 and Tup12 co-repressor proteins.

Authors:  Monica E Ferreira; Kurt D Berndt; Johan Nilsson; Anthony P H Wright
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.