Literature DB >> 10567031

Differences in malsegregation rates obtained by scoring ana-telophases or binucleate cells.

D Cimini1, C Tanzarella, F Degrassi.   

Abstract

In this work we have applied in situ hybridization with alphoid centromeric probes specific to chromosomes 7 and 11 to ana-telophase cells from human primary fibroblasts. The aim was to visualize the events leading to aneuploidy directly during anaphase, analyse the induction of aneuploidy during this mitotic stage and compare the frequencies of chromosome malsegregation observed in ana-telophases with the estimated malsegregation obtained in binucleate cells after a short cytochalasin B treatment. Significantly higher frequencies of chromosome loss and chromosome non-disjunction were observed in fibroblasts undergoing ana-telophase during recovery from a nocodazole-induced mitotic arrest compared with binucleate cells obtained by a further 30 min incubation with cytochalasin B. Using the same experimental schedule, analysis of hybridization signals in mononucleate cells showed higher frequencies of polyploid nuclei in cytochalasin B-treated cultures, indicating that part of the ana-telophases observed after release from the nocodazole-induced mitotic arrest may give rise to polyploid mononucleate cells instead of binucleate ones. A reduced distance between spindle poles was also measured in cells undergoing ana-telophase in the presence of cytochalasin B. Our study suggests that in nocodazole and cytochalasin B-treated cultures the shorter pole-to-pole distance may favour the reformation of a single membrane around telophase chromosomes, especially when several lagging chromosomes lie between the two future daughter nuclei. This would give rise to polyploid mononucleate cells at the ensuing interphase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10567031     DOI: 10.1093/mutage/14.6.563

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutagenesis        ISSN: 0267-8357            Impact factor:   3.000


  29 in total

Review 1.  Chromosomes and cancer cells.

Authors:  Sarah L Thompson; Duane A Compton
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 2.  Mechanisms of chromosomal instability.

Authors:  Sarah L Thompson; Samuel F Bakhoum; Duane A Compton
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Brd4 is required for recovery from antimicrotubule drug-induced mitotic arrest: preservation of acetylated chromatin.

Authors:  Akira Nishiyama; Anup Dey; Jun-Ichi Miyazaki; Keiko Ozato
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 4.138

4.  Histone hyperacetylation in mitosis prevents sister chromatid separation and produces chromosome segregation defects.

Authors:  Daniela Cimini; Marta Mattiuzzo; Liliana Torosantucci; Francesca Degrassi
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2003-06-13       Impact factor: 4.138

5.  APC2 and Axin promote mitotic fidelity by facilitating centrosome separation and cytoskeletal regulation.

Authors:  John S Poulton; Frank W Mu; David M Roberts; Mark Peifer
Journal:  Development       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 6.868

6.  Genotoxicity in cell lines induced by chronic exposure to water-soluble fullerenes using micronucleus test.

Authors:  Yasuharu Niwa; Naoharu Iwai
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.674

Review 7.  Causes and consequences of aneuploidy in cancer.

Authors:  David J Gordon; Benjamin Resio; David Pellman
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 53.242

8.  Mechanisms of aneuploidy.

Authors:  Duane A Compton
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 8.382

9.  Proliferation of aneuploid human cells is limited by a p53-dependent mechanism.

Authors:  Sarah L Thompson; Duane A Compton
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Genome stability is ensured by temporal control of kinetochore-microtubule dynamics.

Authors:  Samuel F Bakhoum; Sarah L Thompson; Amity L Manning; Duane A Compton
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2008-12-07       Impact factor: 28.824

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.