Literature DB >> 10566533

Experimental evidence does not support use of the "no-touch" isolation technique in colorectal cancer.

D García-Olmo1, J Ontañón, D C García-Olmo, M Vallejo, J Cifuentes.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The benefits of the "no-touch" isolation technique usually performed to prevent the circulation of tumor cells are not evident. The aim of this study was to determine whether conventional surgical procedures for treatment of colon cancer could provoke the circulation of tumor cells detected by a genetic technology.
METHODS: Sixteen patients undergoing resection for colorectal cancer and two patients with irresectable tumors were studied. No patient showed liver or lung metastasis. With specific primers for carcinoembryonic antigen, we used reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction to analyze tumor biopsy specimens and blood samples obtained from the antecubital vein before and after surgery and from the main drainage vein of the tumor when the tumor had been extracted. Peritoneal fluid was also collected in irrecsectable cases.
RESULTS: Amplification of cDNA with carcinoembryonic antigen-specific primers was achieved with all tumor biopsies and samples of peritoneal fluid. In two patients carcinoembryonic antigen reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction products were detected in antecubital vein blood before surgery and in one of them also after surgery. Only in one patient (Dukes C) were carcinoembryonic antigen reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction products detected from the main drainage vein of the tumor. In serial dilution experiments we determined that the limit of detection of this method was ten tumor cells in 2 ml of blood.
CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that the use of no-touch isolation techniques in colorectal cancer is not justified, based on lack of evidence indicating the detachment of cells from the tumor at surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10566533     DOI: 10.1007/bf02235045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  7 in total

1.  Enhancing antitumor immunity perioperatively: a matter of timing, cooperation, and specificity.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Curtis; Antonello Punturieri
Journal:  Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 6.914

2.  Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open colectomy for colorectal cancer: influence on neoplastic cell mobilization.

Authors:  X Bessa; A Castells; A M Lacy; J I Elizalde; S Delgado; L Boix; V Piñol; M Pellisé; J C García-Valdecasas; J M Piqué
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Critical concepts and important anatomic landmarks encountered during transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME): toward the mastery of a new operation for rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  S Atallah; M Albert; J R T Monson
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Totally robotic complete mesocolic excision for right-sided colon cancer.

Authors:  Volkan Ozben; Erman Aytac; Deniz Atasoy; Ilknur Erenler Bayraktar; Onur Bayraktar; Ipek Sapci; Bilgi Baca; Tayfun Karahasanoglu; Ismail Hamzaoglu
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2018-05-17

5.  Colorectal cancer metastasis: in the surgeon's hands?

Authors:  Gary Atkin; Abhay Chopada; Ian Mitchell
Journal:  Int Semin Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-02-24

6.  A novel hand-assisted laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for right colon cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Xuyang Yang; Qingbin Wu; Chengwu Jin; Wanbin He; Meng Wang; Tinghan Yang; Mingtian Wei; Xiangbing Deng; Wenjian Meng; Ziqiang Wang
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 7.  Further the liquid biopsy: Gathering pieces of the puzzle of genometastasis theory.

Authors:  Ana García-Casas; Dolores C García-Olmo; Damián García-Olmo
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-10-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.