Literature DB >> 10566483

A large-scale evaluation of terminology integration characteristics.

F S McDonald1, C G Chute, P V Ogren, D Wahner-Roedler, P L Elkin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe terminology integration characteristics of local specialty specific and general vocabularies in order to facilitate the appropriate inclusion and mapping of these terms into a large-scale terminology.
METHODS: We compared the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and positive likelihood ratios for Automated Term Composition to correctly map 9050 local specialty specific (dermatology) terms and 4994 local general terms to UMLS using Metaphrase. Results were systematically combined among exact matches, semantic type filtered matches, and non-filtered matches. For the general set, an analysis of semantic type filtering was performed.
RESULTS: Dermatology exact matches defined a sensitivity of 51% (57% for general terms) and a specificity of 86% (92% general terms). Including semantic type filtered matches increased sensitivity (75% dermatology; 88% general); as did inclusion of non-filtered matches (98% and 99%). These inclusions correspondingly decreased specificity (filtered: 82% and 74%; non-filtered: 52% and 32%). Positive predictive values for exact matches (93.0% dermatology, 97.6% general) were improved by small but significant (p < 0.001) margins by including filtered matches (95.1% dermatology, 98.4% general) but decreased with non-filtered matches (89.2% dermatology, 87.8% general). Adding additional semantic types to the filtering algorithm failed to improve the positive predictive value or the positive likelihood ratio of term mapping, in spite of a 2.3% improvement in sensitivity.
CONCLUSIONS: Automated methods for mapping local "colloquial" terminologies to large-scale controlled health vocabulary systems are practical (ppv 95% dermatology, 98% general). Semantic type filtering improves specificity without sacrificing sensitivity and yields high positive predictive values in every set analyzed.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10566483      PMCID: PMC2232475     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp        ISSN: 1531-605X


  8 in total

1.  Toward representations for medical concepts.

Authors:  D A Evans; D J Rothwell; I A Monarch; R G Lefferts; R A Cote
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1991 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.583

2.  Metaphrase: an aid to the clinical conceptualization and formalization of patient problems in healthcare enterprises.

Authors:  M S Tuttle; N E Olson; K D Keck; W G Cole; M S Erlbaum; D D Sherertz; C G Chute; P L Elkin; G E Atkin; B H Kaihoi; C Safran; D Rind; V Law
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.176

3.  A randomized controlled trial of automated term composition.

Authors:  P L Elkin; K R Bailey; C G Chute
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1998

Review 4.  Desiderata for controlled medical vocabularies in the twenty-first century.

Authors:  J J Cimino
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.176

5.  A clinically derived terminology: qualification to reduction.

Authors:  C G Chute; P L Elkin
Journal:  Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp       Date:  1997

6.  Progress in medical information management. Systematized nomenclature of medicine (SNOMED).

Authors:  R A Côté; S Robboy
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1980 Feb 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Standardized problem list generation, utilizing the Mayo canonical vocabulary embedded within the Unified Medical Language System.

Authors:  P L Elkin; D N Mohr; M S Tuttle; W G Cole; G E Atkin; K Keck; T B Fisk; B H Kaihoi; K E Lee; M C Higgins; H J Suermondt; N Olson; P L Claus; P C Carpenter; C G Chute
Journal:  Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp       Date:  1997

8.  A framework for comprehensive health terminology systems in the United States: development guidelines, criteria for selection, and public policy implications. ANSI Healthcare Informatics Standards Board Vocabulary Working Group and the Computer-Based Patient Records Institute Working Group on Codes and Structures.

Authors:  C G Chute; S P Cohn; J R Campbell
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

  8 in total
  5 in total

1.  UMLS concept indexing for production databases: a feasibility study.

Authors:  F S McDonald; P L Elkin
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 2.  Interface terminologies: facilitating direct entry of clinical data into electronic health record systems.

Authors:  S Trent Rosenbloom; Randolph A Miller; Kevin B Johnson; Peter L Elkin; Steven H Brown
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2006-02-24       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 3.  A review of auditing methods applied to the content of controlled biomedical terminologies.

Authors:  Xinxin Zhu; Jung-Wei Fan; David M Baorto; Chunhua Weng; James J Cimino
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 6.317

4.  Auditing the multiply-related concepts within the UMLS.

Authors:  Fleur Mougin; Natalia Grabar
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Source authenticity in the UMLS--a case study of the Minimal Standard Terminology.

Authors:  Gai Elhanan; Kuo-Chuan Huang; Yehoshua Perl
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 6.317

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.