Literature DB >> 10566390

Can we assess utility using the patient's own words?

D Steward1, K Meyer.   

Abstract

Current methods of utility assessment enable systematic elicitation of patient values in support of medical treatment decision making where interventions involve tradeoffs. Until now, utility assessment protocols have generally employed health care providers' rather than patients' terminology. This study evaluates the feasibility of a protocol that extends traditional methods by using the patient's own words. Fifteen dialysis patients were interviewed with the protocol to elicit individualized multidimensional quality of life (IMQOL) models representing their values. The IMQOL models were then used to assess two modes of dialysis, each with and without complications, as well as the patient's current health. Interview completion rate was 88.2%. Of those completing the interviews, 80% said that they would want the results used to guide decision making in the event of mental incapacity. 53% said the IMQOL model represented their values as well as or better than did traditional utility assessment results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10566390      PMCID: PMC2232793     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp        ISSN: 1531-605X


  10 in total

1.  Health-related quality of life in patient decision making.

Authors:  Robert M Kaplan
Journal:  J Soc Issues       Date:  1991

2.  Values and preferences are not necessarily the same.

Authors:  A Shiell; P Hawe; J Seymour
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Measurement of the validity of utility elicitations performed by computerized interview.

Authors:  L A Lenert; S Morss; M K Goldstein; M R Bergen; W O Faustman; A M Garber
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Explaining distortions in utility elicitation through the rank-dependent model for risky choices.

Authors:  P Wakker; A Stiggelbout
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1995 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  What role do patients wish to play in treatment decision making?

Authors:  R B Deber; N Kraetschmer; J Irvine
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1996-07-08

6.  Patient's view of dialysis care: development of a taxonomy and rating of importance of different aspects of care. CHOICE study. Choices for Healthy Outcomes in Caring for ESRD.

Authors:  H R Rubin; M Jenckes; N E Fink; K Meyer; A W Wu; E B Bass; N Levin; N R Powe
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 8.860

7.  Monitoring dialysis patients' health status.

Authors:  K B Meyer; D M Espindle; J M DeGiacomo; C S Jenuleson; P S Kurtin; A R Davies
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 8.860

Review 8.  The outcomes of ESRD and its treatment.

Authors:  K B Meyer
Journal:  Adv Ren Replace Ther       Date:  1995-04

9.  Measuring the success of treatment in patient terms.

Authors:  K B Bayley; M R London; G L Grunkemeier; D J Lansky
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  The Medical Outcomes Study. An application of methods for monitoring the results of medical care.

Authors:  A R Tarlov; J E Ware; S Greenfield; E C Nelson; E Perrin; M Zubkoff
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-08-18       Impact factor: 56.272

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.