Literature DB >> 10565688

Genital human papillomavirus infection among women recruited for routine cervical cancer screening or for colposcopy determined by Hybrid Capture II and polymerase chain reaction.

D Riethmuller1, C Gay, X Bertrand, D Bettinger, J P Schaal, J P Carbillet, C Lassabe, P Arveux, E Seilles, C Mougin.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical use of the Hybrid Capture (HC)-II system for the detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA to identify women at risk of progression to high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HGSIL) and carcinomas by differentiating low risk (LR) HPV types (6, 11, 42, 43, 44) and high/intermediate risk (HR) HPV types (16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 68). Five hundred and ninety-six women were enrolled in the study. Among them, 466 attended the hospital for routine cytologic screening and 130 were referred for colposcopy because of an abnormal Pap smear. The presence of HPV DNA was tested in cervical samples collected with the Digene Cervical Sampler in Digene Specimen Transport Medium (Digene Corporation, Silver Spring, MD, U.S.A.) using the HC-II assay. Results were compared with those obtained by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the MY09-MY11 primers followed by several hybridizations with specific probes. The overall HPV positivity was 32.9% by HC-II and 37.8% by PCR. Among cytologically normal smears, 19.5% were positive by HC-II (14.3% HR) and 25.1% by PCR. Of the atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance samples, 52.9% were positive by HC-II (41.1% HR) and 55.9% by PCR. Of the low grade SIL, 64.5% were positive by HC-II (59.4% HR) and 68.7% by PCR. The HPV positivity rate was found identical by both techniques in high grade smears (81.6%) and squamous cervical carcinomas (100%). By using PCR as the reference method, the sensitivity of HC-II was higher among women with abnormal cytology than with normal cytology (87.3% vs. 70%). Specificity was 80.8% and 97.5%, respectively. In summary, these results indicate that the HC-II method and MY-PCR identified nearly equivalent prevalences of HPV in cervical smear specimens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10565688     DOI: 10.1097/00019606-199909000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Mol Pathol        ISSN: 1052-9551


  9 in total

1.  Hybrid capture vs. PCR screening of cervical human papilloma virus infections. Cytological and histological associations in 1270 women.

Authors:  Sotirios Tsiodras; John Georgoulakis; Aikaterini Chranioti; Zanis Voulgaris; Amanda Psyrri; Angeliki Tsivilika; John Panayiotides; Petros Karakitsos
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 4.430

2.  Human papillomavirus testing with the hybrid capture 2 assay and PCR as screening tools.

Authors:  S-M Kulmala; S Syrjänen; I Shabalova; N Petrovichev; V Kozachenko; J Podistov; O Ivanchenko; S Zakharenko; R Nerovjna; L Kljukina; M Branovskaja; V Grunberga; A Juschenko; P Tosi; R Santopietro; K Syrjänen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  A generally applicable cost-effectiveness model for the evaluation of vaccines against cervical cancer.

Authors:  Nadia Demarteau; Bruno Detournay; Bertrand Tehard; Abdelkader El Hasnaoui; Baudouin Standaert
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 3.380

4.  Human papillomavirus testing in primary screening for the detection of high-grade cervical lesions: a study of 7932 women.

Authors:  C Clavel; M Masure; J P Bory; I Putaud; C Mangeonjean; M Lorenzato; P Nazeyrollas; R Gabriel; C Quereux; P Birembaut
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 5.  Comparison of the accuracy of Hybrid Capture II and polymerase chain reaction in detecting clinically important cervical dysplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hung N Luu; Kristina R Dahlstrom; Patricia Dolan Mullen; Helena M VonVille; Michael E Scheurer
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2013-04-21       Impact factor: 4.452

6.  Thin-layer liquid-based cervical cytology and PCR for detecting and typing human papillomavirus DNA in Flemish women.

Authors:  C E Depuydt; A J Vereecken; G M Salembier; A S Vanbrabant; L A Boels; E van Herck; M Arbyn; K Segers; J J Bogers
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-02-24       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Self-sampling in cervical cancer screening: comparison of a brush-based and a lavage-based cervicovaginal self-sampling device.

Authors:  Liisa Karjalainen; Ahti Anttila; Pekka Nieminen; Tapio Luostarinen; Anni Virtanen
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Organised screening for cervical cancer in France: a cost-effectiveness assessment.

Authors:  Stéphanie Barré; Marc Massetti; Henri Leleu; Frédéric De Bels
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  High Prevalence of Cervical High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Harboring Atypical Genotypes in Human Immunodeficiency Virus -Infected and -Uninfected First-Generation Adult Immigrant Women Originating from Sub-Saharan Africa and Living in France.

Authors:  Ralph-Sydney Mboumba Bouassa; Camelia Gubavu; David Veyer; Leman Robin; Anne Gravier; Laurent Hocqueloux; Thierry Prazuck; Hélène Péré; Laurent Bélec
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2021-04
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.