Literature DB >> 10564587

Joining of correct and incorrect DNA double-strand break ends in normal human and ataxia telangiectasia fibroblasts.

M Löbrich1, M Kühne, J Wetzel, K Rothkamm.   

Abstract

Chromosomal aberrations are believed to result from the incorrect joining of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). In an attempt to investigate induction and rejoining quality of DSBs following ionizing radiation exposure in specific genomic locations of mammalian DNA, an experimental approach based on Southern hybridization of single-copy probes to NotI restriction fragments was developed. Induction of DSBs is measured from the decrease of the band intensity representing the unbroken restriction fragment. An increase in intensity of the hybridization band following repair incubation determines reconstitution of the original restriction fragment and thus rejoining of correct DNA ends. We investigated the dose dependence of DSB misrejoining using X-ray doses of 5, 10, 20, 40, and 80 Gy and provide evidence that the number of misrejoined DSBs exceeds, for the same doses used, the number of cytogenetically visible aberrations by an order of magnitude, reflecting the higher resolution of our assay. Induction of DSBs and joining of correct and incorrect break ends were further investigated in cells from a patient with the cancer-prone disease ataxia telangiectasia (AT) and in heterozygous AT cells. We found, compared to normal cells, identical induction rates and identical kinetics for joining correct ends following an 80-Gy X-ray exposure. After 5 and 10 Gy, however, AT homozygotes showed a 50% elevation in the proportion of breaks that are not correctly rejoined. These data indicate a defect in the accuracy of DSB rejoining in AT cells that may account for radiation sensitivity and the occurrence of the high level of chromosomal aberrations observed in AT cells. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 27:59-68, 2000. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10564587

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer        ISSN: 1045-2257            Impact factor:   5.006


  13 in total

1.  Pathways of DNA double-strand break repair during the mammalian cell cycle.

Authors:  Kai Rothkamm; Ines Krüger; Larry H Thompson; Markus Löbrich
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Modeling DNA double-strand break repair kinetics as an epiregulated cell-community-wide (epicellcom) response to radiation stress.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 2.658

3.  The linear no-threshold relationship is inconsistent with radiation biologic and experimental data.

Authors:  Maurice Tubiana; Ludwig E Feinendegen; Chichuan Yang; Joseph M Kaminski
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  [Prediction of the reaction of normal tissue and tumor cells to radiotherapy].

Authors:  E Dikomey; J Dahm-Daphi; L Distel
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.621

5.  Development of a novel rapid assay to assess the fidelity of DNA double-strand-break repair in human tumour cells.

Authors:  S J Collis; V K Sangar; A Tighe; S A Roberts; N W Clarke; J H Hendry; G P Margison
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 6.  Defining molecular and cellular responses after low and high linear energy transfer radiations to develop biomarkers of carcinogenic risk or therapeutic outcome.

Authors:  Michael Story; Liang-hao Ding; William A Brock; K Kian Ang; Ghazi Alsbeih; John Minna; Seongmi Park; Amit Das
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.316

7.  The LET dependence of unrepaired chromosome damage in human cells: a break too far?

Authors:  Bradford D Loucas; Michael N Cornforth
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.841

8.  A new model of biodosimetry to integrate low and high doses.

Authors:  Mònica Pujol; Joan-Francesc Barquinero; Pedro Puig; Roser Puig; María Rosa Caballín; Leonardo Barrios
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Residual gammaH2AX foci as an indication of lethal DNA lesions.

Authors:  Judit P Banáth; Dmitry Klokov; Susan H MacPhail; C Adriana Banuelos; Peggy L Olive
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  RNF8-independent Lys63 poly-ubiquitylation prevents genomic instability in response to replication-associated DNA damage.

Authors:  Chantal H M A Ramaekers; Twan van den Beucken; Robert G Bristow; Roland K Chiu; Daniel Durocher; Bradly G Wouters
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.