STUDY DESIGN: An in vitro investigation of three-dimensional kinematics of cervical spine models of one- and three-level corpectomy with anterior plate fixation. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the capability of an anterior plate to stabilize the reconstructed cervical spine under simulated physiologic motions, and to study the effects of fatigue loading. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Clinical studies have found high failure rates of multilevel anterior cervical plate fusions, indicating suboptimal stabilization. However, no biomechanical studies have been done to investigate the stabilizing capabilities of long-plate instrumentations in corpectomy models. METHODS: Seven fresh human cadaveric cervical spine specimens (C2-T1) were used. Flexibility tests consisted of flexion, extension, and bilateral torsion, and lateral bending, each with a pure moment of 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 1.0 Nm. Stabilizing potential indices [(MotionIntact-MotionInstrumented)/MotionIntact] for ranges of motion and neutral zones obtained from the flexibility tests, were measured when the specimen was intact and after one-level (C5) and three-level (C4, C5, and C6) corpectomies and anterior plate stabilizations). The stabilizing potential indices were re-measured after a 1000-cycle fatigue loading (1 Nm flexion and extension moments at C5 vertebra at 0.14 Hz). RESULTS: The differences in stabilizing potential indices of range of motion and neutral zone between one-level and three-level plates were not significant before fatigue. However, after fatigue, the stabilizing potential indices significantly decreased (P < 0.05) for the three-level model, but not for the one-level plate model. CONCLUSIONS: The capability of an anterior cervical plate to stabilize the spine after three-level corpectomy was significantly reduced with fatigue loading.
STUDY DESIGN: An in vitro investigation of three-dimensional kinematics of cervical spine models of one- and three-level corpectomy with anterior plate fixation. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the capability of an anterior plate to stabilize the reconstructed cervical spine under simulated physiologic motions, and to study the effects of fatigue loading. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Clinical studies have found high failure rates of multilevel anterior cervical plate fusions, indicating suboptimal stabilization. However, no biomechanical studies have been done to investigate the stabilizing capabilities of long-plate instrumentations in corpectomy models. METHODS: Seven fresh human cadaveric cervical spine specimens (C2-T1) were used. Flexibility tests consisted of flexion, extension, and bilateral torsion, and lateral bending, each with a pure moment of 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 1.0 Nm. Stabilizing potential indices [(MotionIntact-MotionInstrumented)/MotionIntact] for ranges of motion and neutral zones obtained from the flexibility tests, were measured when the specimen was intact and after one-level (C5) and three-level (C4, C5, and C6) corpectomies and anterior plate stabilizations). The stabilizing potential indices were re-measured after a 1000-cycle fatigue loading (1 Nm flexion and extension moments at C5 vertebra at 0.14 Hz). RESULTS: The differences in stabilizing potential indices of range of motion and neutral zone between one-level and three-level plates were not significant before fatigue. However, after fatigue, the stabilizing potential indices significantly decreased (P < 0.05) for the three-level model, but not for the one-level plate model. CONCLUSIONS: The capability of an anterior cervical plate to stabilize the spine after three-level corpectomy was significantly reduced with fatigue loading.
Authors: Heiko Koller; Rene Schmidt; Michael Mayer; Wolfgang Hitzl; Juliane Zenner; Stefan Midderhoff; Stefan Middendorf; Nicolaus Graf; Nicolaus Gräf; H Resch; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Hans-Joachim Willke Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2010-06-30 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Heiko Koller; Frank Acosta; Mark Tauber; Michael Fox; Hudelmaier Martin; Rosmarie Forstner; Peter Augat; Rainer Penzkofer; Christian Pirich; H Kässmann; Herbert Resch; Wolfgang Hitzl Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2008-01-26 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Heiko Koller; Axel Hempfing; Frank Acosta; Michael Fox; Armin Scheiter; Mark Tauber; Ulrich Holz; Herbert Resch; Wolfgang Hitzl Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2008-01-26 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Heiko Koller; Werner Schmoelz; Juliane Zenner; Alexander Auffarth; Herbert Resch; Wolfgang Hitzl; Davud Malekzadeh; Lukas Ernstbrunner; Martina Blocher; Michael Mayer Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2015-01-23 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Murat Yilmaz; Kasim Zafer Yüksel; Seungwon Baek; Anna G U S Newcomb; Sedat Dalbayrak; Volker K H Sonntag; Neil R Crawford Journal: Clin Spine Surg Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 1.876
Authors: Scott L Parker; Jean Paul Wolinsky; Anthony P Tufaro; Ziya L Gokaslan; Timothy F Witham Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2014-11-22 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Heiko Koller; Wolfgang Hitzl; Frank Acosta; Mark Tauber; Juliane Zenner; Herbert Resch; Yasutsugu Yukawa; Oliver Meier; Rene Schmidt; Michael Mayer Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2009-07-03 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Sebastian Hartmann; Claudius Thomé; Alexander Keiler; Helga Fritsch; Aldemar Andres Hegewald; Werner Schmölz Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2015-08-02 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Heiko Koller; Axel Hempfing; Luis Ferraris; Oliver Maier; Wolfgang Hitzl; Peter Metz-Stavenhagen Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2007-06-29 Impact factor: 3.134