Literature DB >> 10562520

How muscles deal with real-world loads: the influence of length trajectory on muscle performance.

R L Marsh1.   

Abstract

The performance of skeletal muscles in vivo is determined by the feedback received when the muscle interacts with the external environment via various morphological structures. This interaction between the muscle and the 'real-world load' forces us to reconsider how muscles are adapted to suit their in vivo function. We must consider the co-evolution of the muscles and the morphological structures that 'create' the load in concert with the properties of the external environment. This complex set of interactions may limit muscle performance acutely and may also constrain the evolution of morphology and physiology. The performance of skeletal muscle is determined by the length trajectory during movement and the pattern of stimulation. Important features of the length trajectory include its amplitude, frequency, starting length and shape (velocity profile). Many of these parameters interact. For example, changing the velocity profile during shortening may change the optimum values of the other parameters. The length trajectory that maximizes performance depends on the task to be performed. During cyclical work, muscles benefit from using asymmetric cycles with longer shortening than lengthening phases. Modifying this 'sawtooth' cycle by increasing the velocity during shortening may further increase power by augmenting force output and speeding deactivation. In contrast, when accelerating an inertial load, as in jumping, the predicted 'optimal' velocity profile has two peak values, one early and one late in shortening. During level running at constant speed, muscles perform tasks other than producing work and power. Producing force to support the body weight is performed with nearly isometric contractions in some of the limb muscles of vertebrates. Muscles also play a key role in producing stability during running, and the intrinsic properties of the musculoskeletal system may be particularly important in stabilizing rapid running. Recently, muscles in running invertebrates and vertebrates have been described that routinely absorb large amounts of work during running. These muscles are hypothesized to play a key role in stability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10562520     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.202.23.3377

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  20 in total

1.  The theoretical limits to the power output of a muscle-tendon complex with inertial and gravitational loads.

Authors:  Apostolos Galantis; Roger C Woledge
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Constraints on muscular performance: trade-offs between power output and fatigue resistance.

Authors:  Robbie S Wilson; Rob S James
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Function of a large biarticular hip and knee extensor during walking and running in guinea fowl (Numida meleagris).

Authors:  Jennifer A Carr; David J Ellerby; Richard L Marsh
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Unconstrained muscle-tendon workloops indicate resonance tuning as a mechanism for elastic limb behavior during terrestrial locomotion.

Authors:  Benjamin D Robertson; Gregory S Sawicki
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Blood flow in guinea fowl Numida meleagris as an indicator of energy expenditure by individual muscles during walking and running.

Authors:  David J Ellerby; Havalee T Henry; Jennifer A Carr; Cindy I Buchanan; Richard L Marsh
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-02-24       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Running stability is enhanced by a proximo-distal gradient in joint neuromechanical control.

Authors:  M A Daley; G Felix; A A Biewener
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  The role of intrinsic muscle mechanics in the neuromuscular control of stable running in the guinea fowl.

Authors:  Monica A Daley; Alexandra Voloshina; Andrew A Biewener
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 8.  Muscle function in avian flight: achieving power and control.

Authors:  Andrew A Biewener
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 9.  Springs, steroids, and slingshots: the roles of enhancers and constraints in animal movement.

Authors:  Timothy E Higham; Duncan J Irschick
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 2.200

10.  Optimal workloop energetics of muscle-actuated systems: an impedance matching view.

Authors:  Waleed A Farahat; Hugh M Herr
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.