Literature DB >> 10561627

A randomized comparison of oral misoprostol versus Foley catheter and oxytocin for induction of labor at term.

D Abramovici1, S Goldwasser, B C Mabie, B M Mercer, R Goldwasser, B M Sibai.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the efficacy and safety of oral misoprostol administered to patients with the efficacy and safety in a control group treated with a Foley catheter and oxytocin for induction of labor. STUDY
DESIGN: Two hundred patients requiring induction of labor at term with a Bishop score of </=5 were randomized to receive oral misoprostol or a cervical Foley catheter plus oxytocin. Patients in the misoprostol group received 50 microg at 4-hour intervals for a maximum of 6 doses or until an adequate contraction pattern developed. Those in the control group had a Foley catheter inserted in the cervix, whereas oxytocin was administered intravenously by a standard incremental infusion protocol to a maximum dose of 36 mU/min.
RESULTS: In multiparous patients the percentage delivered of their neonates within 24 hours and the median induction-to-delivery times were similar in the 2 groups. In nulliparous patients, however, delivery within 24 hours was significantly less likely in the misoprostol group (53.4% vs 82. 5%; P <.001), and the median induction-to-delivery time was longer (23.3 hours vs 17.2 hours; P <.01). There were no differences in the incidence of meconium, chorioamnionitis, low Apgar scores, or cesarean delivery. The incidence of hyperstimulation was higher in the oxytocin-Foley group (4.1% vs 13.1%; P =.02).
CONCLUSION: Oral misoprostol is as effective as oxytocin-Foley catheter for inducing labor in multiparous women. Misoprostol appears less efficacious in nulliparous patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10561627     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70090-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  7 in total

1.  A Comparison of Vaginal vs. Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labor-Double Blind Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Promila Jindal; Kumkum Avasthi; Maninder Kaur
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2011-10-26

Review 2.  The Renaissance of Transcervical Balloon Catheters for Cervical Ripening and Labour Induction.

Authors:  W Rath; S Kehl
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.915

3.  Intra-vaginal prostaglandin E2 versus double-balloon catheter for labor induction in term oligohydramnios.

Authors:  G Shechter-Maor; G Haran; D Sadeh-Mestechkin; Y Ganor-Paz; M D Fejgin; T Biron-Shental
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 2.521

4.  Induction of labour with a Foley catheter or oral misoprostol at term: the PROBAAT-II study, a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Mieke L G Ten Eikelder; Femke Neervoort; Katrien Oude Rengerink; Gert J van Baaren; Marta Jozwiak; Jan-Willem de Leeuw; Irene de Graaf; Maria G van Pampus; Maureen Franssen; Martijn Oudijk; Paulien van der Salm; Mallory Woiski; Paula Jm Pernet; A Hanneke Feitsma; Huib van Vliet; Martina Porath; Frans Roumen; Erik van Beek; Hans Versendaal; Marion Heres; Ben Willem J Mol; Kitty W M Bloemenkamp
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 5.  Mechanical methods for induction of labour.

Authors:  Marieke Dt de Vaan; Mieke Lg Ten Eikelder; Marta Jozwiak; Kirsten R Palmer; Miranda Davies-Tuck; Kitty Wm Bloemenkamp; Ben Willem J Mol; Michel Boulvain
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-10-18

6.  Low-dose oral misoprostol for induction of labour.

Authors:  Robbie S Kerr; Nimisha Kumar; Myfanwy J Williams; Anna Cuthbert; Nasreen Aflaifel; David M Haas; Andrew D Weeks
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-06-22

7.  Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Nulliparous Participants Undergoing Labor Induction by Cervical Ripening Method.

Authors:  Maria Andrikopoulou; Elisa T Bushman; Madeline M Rice; William A Grobman; Uma M Reddy; Robert M Silver; Yasser Y El-Sayed; Dwight J Rouse; George R Saade; John M Thorp; Suneet P Chauhan; Maged M Costantine; Edward K Chien; Brian M Casey; Sindhu K Srinivas; Geeta K Swamy; Hyagriv N Simhan
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 1.862

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.