Literature DB >> 10561408

Compensation for interaction torques during single- and multijoint limb movement.

P L Gribble1, D J Ostry.   

Abstract

During multijoint limb movements such as reaching, rotational forces arise at one joint due to the motions of limb segments about other joints. We report the results of three experiments in which we assessed the extent to which control signals to muscles are adjusted to counteract these "interaction torques." Human subjects performed single- and multijoint pointing movements involving shoulder and elbow motion, and movement parameters related to the magnitude and direction of interaction torques were manipulated systematically. We examined electromyographic (EMG) activity of shoulder and elbow muscles and, specifically, the relationship between EMG activity and joint interaction torque. A first set of experiments examined single-joint movements. During both single-joint elbow (experiment 1) and shoulder (experiment 2) movements, phasic EMG activity was observed in muscles spanning the stationary joint (shoulder muscles in experiment 1 and elbow muscles in experiment 2). This muscle activity preceded movement and varied in amplitude with the magnitude of upcoming interaction torque (the load resulting from motion of the nonstationary limb segment). In a third experiment, subjects performed multijoint movements involving simultaneous motion at the shoulder and elbow. Movement amplitude and velocity at one joint were held constant, while the direction of movement about the other joint was varied. When the direction of elbow motion was varied (flexion vs. extension) and shoulder kinematics were held constant, EMG activity in shoulder muscles varied depending on the direction of elbow motion (and hence the sign of the interaction torque arising at the shoulder). Similarly, EMG activity in elbow muscles varied depending on the direction of shoulder motion for movements in which elbow kinematics were held constant. The results from all three experiments support the idea that central control signals to muscles are adjusted, in a predictive manner, to compensate for interaction torques-loads arising at one joint that depend on motion about other joints.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10561408     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1999.82.5.2310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  88 in total

1.  Effects of gravitational load on jaw movements in speech.

Authors:  D M Shiller; D J Ostry; P L Gribble
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Proprioceptively guided reaching movements in 3D space: effects of age, task complexity and handedness.

Authors:  T S Schaap; T I Gonzales; T W J Janssen; S H Brown
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Interlimb differences of directional biases for stroke production.

Authors:  Wanyue Wang; Travis Johnson; Robert L Sainburg; Natalia Dounskaia
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Influence of movement speed on accuracy and coordination of reaching movements to memorized targets in three-dimensional space in a deafferented subject.

Authors:  Julie Messier; Sergei Adamovich; Michail Berkinblit; Eugene Tunik; Howard Poizner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-09       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Biomechanics of reaching: clinical implications for individuals with acquired brain injury.

Authors:  P H McCrea; J J Eng; A J Hodgson
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2002-07-10       Impact factor: 3.033

6.  Kinematics of wrist joint flexion in overarm throws made by skilled subjects.

Authors:  D B Debicki; P L Gribble; S Watts; J Hore
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-11-04       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Arm-trunk coordination in the absence of proprioception.

Authors:  E Tunik; H Poizner; M F Levin; S V Adamovich; J Messier; Y Lamarre; A G Feldman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-19       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Interlimb differences in control of movement extent.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg; Sydney Y Schaefer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-04-28       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  The time course for kinetic versus kinematic planning of goal-directed human motor behavior.

Authors:  Michael Vesia; Helena Vander; Xiaogang Yan; Lauren E Sergio
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-08-12       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 10.  Optimality principles in sensorimotor control.

Authors:  Emanuel Todorov
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 24.884

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.