Literature DB >> 10556267

Larsen scoring of digitized X-ray images.

C Solymossy1, J Dixey, M Utley, S Gallivan, A Young, N Cox, P Davies, P Emery, A Gough, D James, P Prouse, P Williams, J Winfield.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine how Larsen scores from digitized X-rays compare to those from film originals.
METHODS: A hundred sets of radiographs of patients recruited with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were assessed using the Larsen scoring system. Digitized copies of these sets were then viewed on a computer screen and scored according to Larsen in a random order. The quality of the digitized image was also recorded. For each set of X-rays, the signed difference between the score from film and the score from the digitized images was calculated.
RESULTS: A total of 95% of the digitized X-ray sets were scored successfully; 5% were not scored due to the images being unreadable. The mean difference between the two sets of scores was -1.2 (95% CI [-2.06, -0.37]). There was no trend in the difference with respect to the mean of the two scores (P>0.1).
CONCLUSION: The Larsen scoring of digitized X-ray images has been validated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10556267     DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/38.11.1127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)        ISSN: 1462-0324            Impact factor:   7.580


  6 in total

Review 1.  An overview of commonly used radiographic scoring methods in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials.

Authors:  Vinod Ravindran; Satish Rachapalli
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 2.  Radiographic scoring methods as outcome measures in rheumatoid arthritis: properties and advantages.

Authors:  S Boini; F Guillemin
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  Use of conservative and surgical foot care in an inception cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Michael R Backhouse; Anne-Maree Keenan; Elizabeth M A Hensor; Adam Young; David James; Josh Dixey; Peter Williams; Peter Prouse; Andrew Gough; Philip S Helliwell; Anthony C Redmond
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 7.580

4.  Evaluation of the Efficacy of Combined Therapy of Methotrexate and Etanercept versus Methotrexate as a Mono-Therapy.

Authors:  Sylejman Rexhepi; Mjellma Rexhepi; Blerta Rexhepi; Vjollca Sahatçiu-Meka; Vigan Mahmutaj
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2018-04-24

5.  Validity of a two-component imaging-derived disease activity score for improved assessment of synovitis in early rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Elizabeth M A Hensor; Paul McKeigue; Stephanie F Ling; Marco Colombo; Jennifer H Barrett; Jackie L Nam; Jane Freeston; Maya H Buch; Athina Spiliopoulou; Felix Agakov; Stephen Kelly; Myles J Lewis; Suzanne M M Verstappen; Alexander J MacGregor; Sebastien Viatte; Anne Barton; Costantino Pitzalis; Paul Emery; Philip G Conaghan; Ann W Morgan
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 7.580

6.  Association of HLA-DRB1 haplotypes with rheumatoid arthritis severity, mortality, and treatment response.

Authors:  Sebastien Viatte; Darren Plant; Buhm Han; Bo Fu; Annie Yarwood; Wendy Thomson; Deborah P M Symmons; Jane Worthington; Adam Young; Kimme L Hyrich; Ann W Morgan; Anthony G Wilson; John D Isaacs; Soumya Raychaudhuri; Anne Barton
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 56.272

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.