Literature DB >> 10555792

Patients' perception of recovery after third molar surgery.

S M Conrad1, G H Blakey, D A Shugars, R D Marciani, C Phillips, R P White.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study evaluated patients' perceptions of recovery after third molar surgery.
METHODS: Two hundred forty-nine patients (age 13 to 37 years) at 2 clinical centers were enrolled in a prospective study before the surgical removal of third molars. Each patient was given a 21-item Health-Related Quality of Life instrument (HRQOL) to be completed each postoperative day (POD) for 14 days. The instrument was designed to assess patients' perception of recovery: pain, oral function, general activity measures, and other symptoms. Pain dimensions were recorded with a 7-point Likert-type scale; all other conditions were measured on 5-point Likert-type scales. The impact of each predictor variable such as age, gender, and length of surgery on recovery was assessed with Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel statistics, controlling for clinical center.
RESULTS: After the 14-day postoperative period, 201 of the original 249 patients returned the completed HRQOL instrument; the 48 patients who did not return their diary had third molar conditions and surgery similar to the 201 patients who responded. On POD 1, 63.5% of patients reported their worst pain as severe (score, 5 to 7/7) at some time during the day. By POD 7, only 15% of patients reported their worst pain as severe. Average pain levels were much less; 29% reported their average pain as severe (score, 5 to 7/7) on POD 1, decreasing to 5.5% by POD 7. Patients experienced substantial interference in oral function; chewing, 85%; mouth opening 78.5%, and speaking 37.5% on POD 1. By POD 6, oral function had improved; chewing, 19%, mouth opening, 15%; and speaking, 1.5%. General measures also were affected on POD 1; social activity, 61.5%; recreation, 70.5%; and daily routine, 60%. Patients assumed a more normal lifestyle by POD 5. Swelling seemed to be at its maximum on PODs 1 and 2 (day 1, 53%; day 2, 61%) and decreased markedly by POD 5 (10%). Food collection in the surgical sites posed the biggest problem for patients on POD 9 (20%). Age was not a predictor of prolonged recovery. However, surgery time 30 minutes or longer, or having all third molars below the occlusal plane, did prolong recovery. Females also reported a longer recovery period.
CONCLUSIONS: This information is valuable to patients deciding on third molar surgery and to clinicians providing informed consent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10555792     DOI: 10.1016/s0278-2391(99)90861-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  32 in total

Review 1.  Ibuprofen and/or paracetamol (acetaminophen) for pain relief after surgical removal of lower wisdom teeth, a Cochrane systematic review.

Authors:  E Bailey; H Worthington; P Coulthard
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.626

Review 2.  Common risk factors for postoperative pain following the extraction of wisdom teeth.

Authors:  Vahid Rakhshan
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-04-23

3.  Prophylactic removal of impacted mandibular third molars: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

Authors:  Juliet Hounsome; Gerlinde Pilkington; James Mahon; Angela Boland; Sophie Beale; Eleanor Kotas; Tara Renton; Rumona Dickson
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.014

4.  Comparing the Efficiencies of Third Molar Surgeries With and Without a Dentist Anesthesiologist.

Authors:  Uday Reebye; S Young; E Boukas; E Davidian; J Carnahan
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2017

5.  Comparative Evaluation of Immediate Post-Operative Sequelae after Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar with or without Tube Drain - Split-Mouth Study.

Authors:  Barun Kumar; Kalyani Bhate; R S Dolas; Sn Santhosh Kumar; Pushkar Waknis
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-12-01

6.  Oral health-related quality of life following third molar surgery with either oral administration or submucosal injection of prednisolone.

Authors:  Adebayo Aremu Ibikunle; Wasiu Lanre Adeyemo; Akinola Ladipo Ladeinde
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-07-22

7.  Cryotherapy and topical minocycline as adjunctive measures to control pain after third molar surgery: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Savannah Gelesko; Leann Long; Jan Faulk; Ceib Phillips; Carolyn Dicus; Raymond P White
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 1.895

8.  A qualitative report of patient problems and postoperative instructions.

Authors:  Kathryn A Atchison; Edward E Black; Richard Leathers; Thomas R Belin; Mirna Abrego; Melanie W Gironda; Daniel Wong; Vivek Shetty; Claudia DerMartirosian
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  Short-term recovery after orthognathic surgery: a medical daily diary approach.

Authors:  Ceib Phillips; George Blakey
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 2.789

10.  Recovery after orthognathic surgery: short-term health-related quality of life outcomes.

Authors:  Ceib Phillips; George Blakey; Michael Jaskolka
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.