Literature DB >> 10555679

The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents. MR imaging safety considerations. Radiological Society of North America.

R R Price1.   

Abstract

Experience and research over the past decade have demonstrated that diagnostic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is a biologically safe imaging modality. Specifically, there is currently no convincing evidence that there is any long-term or irreversible biologic effects associated with the radiation and magnetic fields used in MR imaging, specifically radio-frequency (RF) radiation, static magnetic fields, and time-varying gradient fields. However, numerous hazards of MR imaging do exist that can cause severe injuries or even death. These hazards are primarily the result of (a) strong magnetic fields and the strong force that they exert on ferromagnetic objects brought into their influence, including interference with electronic devices such as pacemakers and other implanted electronic devices, and (b) RF burns resulting from inadvertently induced currents in conductive loops placed on the patient's skin surface (eg, electrocardiographic leads and other monitoring devices). Other potential concerns are peripheral nerve stimulation resulting from rapidly switched gradients and auditory noise levels. Establishing a complete and coordinated educational program for all MR imaging facility personnel and conducting effective screening and preparation of patients scheduled for MR imaging procedures are essential to avoid accidents and RF burns and to maintain a safe MR imaging facility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10555679     DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.19.6.g99no331641

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  7 in total

Review 1.  Muskuloskeletal MR imaging at 3.0 T: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Nicolae Bolog; Daniel Nanz; Dominik Weishaupt
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  FEF inactivation with improved optogenetic methods.

Authors:  Leah Acker; Erica N Pino; Edward S Boyden; Robert Desimone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Patient Monitoring System for MRI: An Evidence-Based Analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2003-12-01

4.  [MRT-induced burns in tattooed patients. Case report of an traumatic surgery patient].

Authors:  D Klitscher; J Blum; K F Kreitner; P M Rommens
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  Controlled E-field gradient coils.

Authors:  P Mansfield; R M Bowley; B Haywood
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2003-10-31       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Effects of external electrical and magnetic fields on pacemakers and defibrillators: from engineering principles to clinical practice.

Authors:  Roy Beinart; Saman Nazarian
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  A coaxial optrode as multifunction write-read probe for optogenetic studies in non-human primates.

Authors:  Ilker Ozden; Jing Wang; Yao Lu; Travis May; Joonhee Lee; Werapong Goo; Daniel J O'Shea; Paul Kalanithi; Ilka Diester; Mohamed Diagne; Karl Deisseroth; Krishna V Shenoy; Arto V Nurmikko
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 2.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.