BACKGROUND: Malignant mesothelioma, a mesoderm-derived tumor, is related to asbestos exposure and remains a diagnostic challenge because none of the genetic or immunohistochemical markers have yet been proven to be specific. To assist in the identification of mesothelioma and to differentiate it from other common lesions at the same location, we have tested the performance of syntactic structure analysis (SSA) in an automated classification procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Light-microscopic images of tissue sections of malignant mesothelioma, hyperplastic mesothelium, and adenocarcinoma were analyzed using parameters selected from the Voronoi diagram, Gabriel's graph, and the minimum spanning tree which were classified with a K-nearest-neighbor algorithm. RESULTS: Results showed that mesotheliomas were diagnosed correctly in 74% of the cases; 76% of the adenocarcinomas were correctly graded, and 88% of the mesotheliomas were correctly typed. The performance of the parameters was dependent on the obtained classification (i.e., tumor-tumor versus tumor-benign). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that SSA is valuable in the differential classification of mesothelioma and that it supplements a visually appraised diagnosis. The recognition scores may be increased by a combination of SSA with, for example, cellular or nuclear parameters, measured at higher magnifications to form a solid base for fully automated expert systems.
BACKGROUND:Malignant mesothelioma, a mesoderm-derived tumor, is related to asbestos exposure and remains a diagnostic challenge because none of the genetic or immunohistochemical markers have yet been proven to be specific. To assist in the identification of mesothelioma and to differentiate it from other common lesions at the same location, we have tested the performance of syntactic structure analysis (SSA) in an automated classification procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Light-microscopic images of tissue sections of malignant mesothelioma, hyperplastic mesothelium, and adenocarcinoma were analyzed using parameters selected from the Voronoi diagram, Gabriel's graph, and the minimum spanning tree which were classified with a K-nearest-neighbor algorithm. RESULTS: Results showed that mesotheliomas were diagnosed correctly in 74% of the cases; 76% of the adenocarcinomas were correctly graded, and 88% of the mesotheliomas were correctly typed. The performance of the parameters was dependent on the obtained classification (i.e., tumor-tumor versus tumor-benign). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that SSA is valuable in the differential classification of mesothelioma and that it supplements a visually appraised diagnosis. The recognition scores may be increased by a combination of SSA with, for example, cellular or nuclear parameters, measured at higher magnifications to form a solid base for fully automated expert systems.