Literature DB >> 10553855

Pressures exerted against the cervical vertebrae by the standard and intubating laryngeal mask airways: a randomized, controlled, cross-over study in fresh cadavers.

C Keller1, J Brimacombe, K Keller.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: In this randomized, controlled, cross-over study, we measured the pressures exerted by the standard laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and the intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILM) against the cervical vertebrae during insertion, intubation, and maneuvers commonly used to facilitate intubation. We also assessed the effect of these pressures on cervical spine (C-spine) movement. Twenty cadavers (6-24 h postmortem) without cervical abnormality were initially studied. Three microchip pressure sensors were implanted into the pharyngeal surface of C2-3. The size 5 ILM and LMA were inserted in random order into each cadaver with the head-neck in the neutral position. Maximal cervical pressures (CPmax) were recorded for both devices during cuff inflation from 0-40 mL and with the intracuff pressure (ICP) at 60 cm H2O, insertion, fiberscope-guided intubation, partial withdrawal/reinsertion (ILM only), elevation/depression of the handle with 20 N of force applied (ILM only). In five additional matched cadavers, the effect of pressure on posterior displacement of C3 was assessed, and CPmax was measured during laryngoscope- and fiberscope-guided oro/nasotracheal intubation (controls). CPmax was higher for the ILM than the LMA over the inflation range (96 vs 15 cm H2O; P < 0.0001) and with the ICP at 60 cm H2O (95 vs 10 cm H2O; P < 0.0001). During cuff inflation, CPmax was generally unchanged for the ILM but was always increased for the LMA. CPmax for the LMA and ILM was similar during insertion (224 vs 273 cm H2O) but higher for the ILM during fiberscope-guided intubation (96 vs 43 cm H2O; P < 0.0001). At 60 cm H2O ICP, CPmax increased during LMA (224 cm H2O; P < 0.0001) and ILM insertion (273 cm H2O; P < 0.0001) and increased for the LMA (43 cm H2O; P < 0.0001) but was unchanged for the ILM (96 cm H2O) during fiberscope-guided intubation. For the ILM, CP-max increased during handle depression (394 cm H2O; P < 0.0001) and partial withdrawal/reinsertion (265 cm H2O; P < 0.0001) but decreased during handle elevation (6 cm H2O; P < 0.00001). CPmax for the controls was usually zero and was always less than the LMA/ ILM (P < 0.0001). The mean (range) for posterior displacement of C3 was 0.8 (0-2) mm at 100 cm H2O and 2.8 (1-5) mm at 400 cm H2O. Laryngeal mask devices exert greater pressures against the cervical vertebrae than established intubation techniques and can produce posterior displacement of the C-spine. IMPLICATIONS: Laryngeal mask devices exert greater pressures against the cervical vertebrae than established intubation techniques and can produce posterior displacement of the cervical spine. We recommend that laryngeal mask devices only be used in the unstable cervical spine if difficulties are anticipated or encountered with established techniques, pending the results of studies demonstrating its relative safety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10553855

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  10 in total

1.  Intubating laryngeal mask airway allows tracheal intubation when the cervical spine is immobilized by a rigid collar.

Authors:  R Komatsu; O Nagata; K Kamata; K Yamagata; D I Sessler; M Ozaki
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2004-08-20       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  [Comparison of two different laryngeal mask models for airway management in patients with immobilization of the cervical spine].

Authors:  C Gernoth; O Jandewerth; M Contzen; J Hinkelbein; H Genzwürker
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 3.  Potential cervical spine injury and difficult airway management for emergency intubation of trauma adults in the emergency department--a systematic review.

Authors:  J E Ollerton; M J A Parr; K Harrison; B Hanrahan; M Sugrue
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  Comparison of the intubating laryngeal mask airway and laryngeal tube placement during manual in-line stabilisation of the neck.

Authors:  R Komatsu; O Nagata; K Kamata; K Yamagata; D I Sessler; M Ozaki
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 6.955

Review 5.  [Methods of airway management in prehospital emergency medicine].

Authors:  W Keul; M Bernhard; A Völkl; R Gust; A Gries
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 6.  [Prehospital management of spinal cord injuries].

Authors:  M Bernhard; A Gries; P Kremer; A Martin-Villalba; B W Böttiger
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.041

7.  Airway management in trauma.

Authors:  Rashid M Khan; Pradeep K Sharma; Naresh Kaul
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2011-09

Review 8.  Anesthetic considerations for patients with acute cervical spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Fang-Ping Bao; Hong-Gang Zhang; Sheng-Mei Zhu
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 5.135

9.  Awake supraglottic airway guided flexible bronchoscopic intubation in patients with anticipated difficult airways: a case series and narrative review.

Authors:  Wan Yen Lim; Patrick Wong
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-09-02

10.  Airway management in cervical spine injury.

Authors:  Naola Austin; Vijay Krishnamoorthy; Arman Dagal
Journal:  Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci       Date:  2014-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.