Literature DB >> 10553851

The use of a remifentanil infusion for hemodynamic control during intracranial surgery.

Z Gesztesi1, B L Mootz, P F White.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Remifentanil is an extremely rapid and short-acting opioid analgesic which is effective in controlling acute stress responses during surgery. During neurosurgical anesthesia, laryngoscopy and intubation, application of the head holder, scalp incision, and the craniectomy can produce significant increases in mean arterial pressure (MAP). In this dose-response study, we evaluated the efficacy of a remifentanil infusion in maintaining hemodynamic stability during intracranial surgery under desflurane anesthesia. Forty-five patients were assigned randomly to one of the three remifentanil infusion groups. All patients received a standardized anesthetic induction consisting of midazolam, 2 mg IV, lidocaine 0.75 mg/kg IV, propofol 1.0 mg/kg IV, and remifentanil 0.5 microg/kg IV. Immediately after induction of anesthesia, a remifentanil infusion was started at 0.0625 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) (Group 1), 0.125 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) (Group 2), or 0.250 microg x kg (-1) x min(-1)(Group 3) according to a double-blinded study protocol. Maintenance of anesthesia consisted of desflurane 3% (end-tidal) in air/oxygen. If the MAP exceeded 80 mm Hg, a supplemental bolus of remifentanil, 0.5 microg/kg IV was administered, and when the MAP decreased below 65 mm Hg, the remifentanil infusion was discontinued temporarily. "Rescue" cardiovascular medications consisted of nitroprusside (100 microg IV) or phenylephrine (100 microg IV). Heart rate, systolic, diastolic, and MAP values, were recorded every minute for 20 min after each specific stimulus. The overall quality of the intraoperative hemodynamic control was evaluated by the attending anesthesiologist on a scale from 1 = poor to 5 = excellent. The overall quality of the hemodynamic control was superior in Group 2 compared with Group 1 (P < 0.05). Although the total dose of remifentanil administered during the study period did not differ among the three groups, Group 1 required significantly more supplemental boluses of remifentanil (66%-80%) than Groups 2 (13%-33%) and 3 (70% 13%), and the remifentanil infusion was discontinued more often in Group 3 (80%-93%) than in Groups 1 (0%-13%) and 2 (21%-40%). In conclusion, the recommended remifentanil infusion rate for controlling acute autonomic responses during neurosurgical anesthesia is 0.125 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) when administered during a desflurane-based anesthetic. IMPLICATIONS: Compared with remifentanil 0.0625 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) and 0.250 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1), a remifentanil infusion rate of 0.125 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) provided more stable hemodynamic conditions during intracranial surgery under desflurane anesthesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10553851

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  8 in total

Review 1.  Comparative tolerability of sedative agents in head-injured adults.

Authors:  Susan C Urwin; David K Menon
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Impact of remifentanil use on early postoperative outcomes following brain tumor resection or rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Kanji Uchida; Hideo Yasunaga; Hiroaki Miyata; Masahiko Sumitani; Hiromasa Horiguchi; Shinya Matsuda; Yoshitsugu Yamada
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 3.  Impact of Opioid-Free Anesthesia on Analgesia and Recovery Following Bariatric Surgery: a Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies.

Authors:  I-Wen Chen; Cheuk-Kwan Sun; Kuo-Chuan Hung; Chong-Chi Chiu; Chih-Wei Hsu; Chien-Ming Lin; Shu-Wei Liao; I-Chia Teng
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 3.479

4.  Effect-site concentration of remifentanil for minimizing cardiovascular changes by inhalation of desflurane.

Authors:  Hee Jin Jeong; Hee Jung Baik; Jong Hak Kim; Youn Jin Kim; Jae Hyon Bahk
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 2.759

5.  Accidental subcutaneous remifentanil infusion as a cause of delayed awakening after craniotomy.

Authors:  Alexander Wolfson; Cephas Swamidoss
Journal:  Case Rep Anesthesiol       Date:  2011-11-03

6.  A Prospective Randomized Comparison of Postoperative Pain and Complications after Thyroidectomy under Different Anesthetic Techniques: Volatile Anesthesia versus Total Intravenous Anesthesia.

Authors:  Jun-Young Jo; Yeon Ju Kim; Seong-Soo Choi; Jihoon Park; Han Park; Kyung-Don Hahm
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 3.037

7.  Safety and efficacy of analgesia-based sedation with remifentanil versus standard hypnotic-based regimens in intensive care unit patients with brain injuries: a randomised, controlled trial [ISRCTN50308308].

Authors:  Andreas Karabinis; Kostas Mandragos; Spiros Stergiopoulos; Apostolos Komnos; Jens Soukup; Ben Speelberg; Andrew J T Kirkham
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2004-06-28       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 8.  Pain Therapy Guided by Purpose and Perspective in Light of the Opioid Epidemic.

Authors:  Amie L Severino; Arash Shadfar; Joshua K Hakimian; Oliver Crane; Ganeev Singh; Keith Heinzerling; Wendy M Walwyn
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 4.157

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.