Literature DB >> 10552322

Lumbar spine stability can be augmented with an abdominal belt and/or increased intra-abdominal pressure.

J Cholewicki1, K Juluru, A Radebold, M M Panjabi, S M McGill.   

Abstract

The increased intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) commonly observed when the spine is loaded during physical activities is hypothesized to increase lumbar spine stability. The mechanical stability of the lumbar spine is an important consideration in low back injury prevention and rehabilitation strategies. This study examined the effects of raised IAP and an abdominal belt on lumbar spine stability. Two hypotheses were tested: (1) An increase in IAP leads to increased lumbar spine stability, (2) Wearing an abdominal belt increases spine stability. Ten volunteers were placed in a semi-seated position in a jig that restricted hip motion leaving the upper torso free to move in any direction. The determination of lumbar spine stability was accomplished by measuring the instantaneous trunk stiffness in response to a sudden load release. The quick release method was applied in isometric trunk flexion, extension, and lateral bending. Activity of 12 major trunk muscles was monitored with electromyography and the IAP was measured with an intra-gastric pressure transducer. A two-factor repeated measures design was used (P < 0.05), in which the spine stability was evaluated under combinations of the following two factors: belt or no belt and three levels of IAP (0, 40, and 80% of maximum). The belt and raised IAP increased trunk stiffness in all directions, but the results in extension lacked statistical significance. In flexion, trunk stiffness increased by 21% and 42% due to 40% and 80% IAP levels respectively; in lateral bending, trunk stiffness increased by 16% and 30%. The belt added between 9% and 57% to the trunk stiffness depending on the IAP level and the direction of exertion. In all three directions, the EMG activity of all 12 trunk muscles increased significantly due to the elevated IAP. The belt had no effect on the activity of any of the muscles with the exception of the thoracic erector spinae in extension and the lumbar erector spinae in flexion, whose activities decreased. The results indicate that both wearing an abdominal belt and raised IAP can each independently, or in combination, increase lumbar spine stability. However, the benefits of the belt must be interpreted with caution in the context of the decreased activation of a few trunk extensor muscles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10552322      PMCID: PMC3611203          DOI: 10.1007/s005860050192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  35 in total

1.  Influence of fatigue in neuromuscular control of spinal stability.

Authors:  Kevin P Granata; Greg P Slota; Sara E Wilson
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.888

2.  Movement of the upper body and muscle activity patterns following a rapidly applied load: the influence of pre-load alterations.

Authors:  T Bull Andersen; M Essendrop; B Schibye
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-02-11       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  The effects of low back pain on natural breath control during a lowering task.

Authors:  Eric M Lamberg; Marshall Hagins
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-02-04       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Role of intra-abdominal pressure in the unloading and stabilization of the human spine during static lifting tasks.

Authors:  N Arjmand; A Shirazi-Adl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Natural breath control during lifting tasks: effect of load.

Authors:  Marshall Hagins; Eric M Lamberg
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-12-10       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Low-back biomechanics and static stability during isometric pushing.

Authors:  Kevin R Granata; Bradford C Bennett
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.888

7.  The effects of trunk stiffness on postural control during unstable seated balance.

Authors:  N Peter Reeves; Vanessa Q Everding; Jacek Cholewicki; David C Morrisette
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Contribution of sensorimotor integration to spinal stabilization in humans.

Authors:  Adam D Goodworth; Robert J Peterka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Changes in intra-abdominal pressure and spontaneous breath volume by magnitude of lifting effort: highly trained athletes versus healthy men.

Authors:  Masashi Kawabata; Norihiro Shima; Hatsuyuki Hamada; Isamu Nakamura; Hidetsugu Nishizono
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Comparison of trunk stiffness provided by different design characteristics of lumbosacral orthoses.

Authors:  Jacek Cholewicki; Angela S Lee; N Peter Reeves; David C Morrisette
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 2.063

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.